期刊论文详细信息
Behavioral and Brain Functions
Facial and semantic emotional interference: A pilot study on the behavioral and cortical responses to the dual valence association task
Agustín Ibáñez1  Esteban Hurtado3  Rodrigo Riveros4  Hugo Urquina1  Juan F Cardona1  Agustín Petroni5  Alejandro Lobos-Infante4  Joaquin Barutta2  Sandra Baez4  Facundo Manes1 
[1] Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
[2] Laboratory of Epistemology and History of Medicine (LEPHIM), Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
[4] Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO) and Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University, Argentina
[5] Integrative Neuroscience Laboratory, Physics Department, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词: face;    word;    valence;    interference effects;    DVAT;    IAT;    LPP;    N170;    ERP;   
Others  :  797651
DOI  :  10.1186/1744-9081-7-8
 received in 2010-10-15, accepted in 2011-04-13,  发布年份 2011
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Integration of compatible or incompatible emotional valence and semantic information is an essential aspect of complex social interactions. A modified version of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) called Dual Valence Association Task (DVAT) was designed in order to measure conflict resolution processing from compatibility/incompatibly of semantic and facial valence. The DVAT involves two emotional valence evaluative tasks which elicits two forms of emotional compatible/incompatible associations (facial and semantic).

Methods

Behavioural measures and Event Related Potentials were recorded while participants performed the DVAT.

Results

Behavioural data showed a robust effect that distinguished compatible/incompatible tasks. The effects of valence and contextual association (between facial and semantic stimuli) showed early discrimination in N170 of faces. The LPP component was modulated by the compatibility of the DVAT.

Conclusions

Results suggest that DVAT is a robust paradigm for studying the emotional interference effect in the processing of simultaneous information from semantic and facial stimuli.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Ibáñez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140706072801673.pdf 860KB PDF download
Figure 3. 39KB Image download
Figure 2. 44KB Image download
Figure 1. 17KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Barrett LF, Lindquist KA, Gendron M: Language as context for the perception of emotion. Trends Cogn Sci 2007, 11:327-332.
  • [2]Havas DA, Glenberg AM, Rink M: Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychon Bull & Rev 2007, 14:436-441.
  • [3]Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL: Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998, 74:1464-1480.
  • [4]De Houwer J, Teige-Mocigemba S, Spruyt A, Moors A: Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychol Bull 2009, 135:347-368.
  • [5]Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR: Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 2009, 97:17-41.
  • [6]Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G: Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8:551-565.
  • [7]Joyce C, Rossion B: The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: the effect of reference electrode site. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:2613-2631.
  • [8]Rebai M, Poiroux S, Bernard C, Lalonde R: Event-related potentials for category-specific information during passive viewing of faces and objects. Int J Neurosci 2001, 106:209-226.
  • [9]Rossion B, Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Despland P, Bruyer R, Linotte S, Crommelinck M: The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport 2000, 11:69-74.
  • [10]Rossion B, Curran T, Gauthier I: A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition 2002, 85:189-196.
  • [11]Brandeis D, Lehmann D, Michel CM, Mingrone W: Mapping event-related brain potential microstates to sentence endings. Brain Topogr 1995, 8:145-159.
  • [12]Rossion B, Joyce CA, Cottrell GW, Tarr MJ: Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1609-1624.
  • [13]Bentin S, Mouchetant-Rostaing Y, Giard MH, Echallier JF, Pernier J: ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution. J Cogn Neurosci 1999, 11:235-260.
  • [14]Ashley V, Vuilleumier P, Swick D: Time course and specificity of event-related potentials to emotional expressions. Neuroreport 2004, 15:211-216.
  • [15]Batty M, Taylor MJ: Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003, 17:613-620.
  • [16]Blau VC, Maurer U, Tottenham N, McCandliss BD: The face-specific N170 component is modulated by emotional facial expression. Behav Brain Funct 2007, 3:7. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [17]Pizzagalli DA, Lehmann D, Hendrick AM, Regard M, Pascual-Marqui RD, Davidson RJ: Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (approximately 160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. Neuroimage 2002, 16:663-677.
  • [18]Dufey M, Hurtado E, Fernandez AM, Ibañez A: Exploring the relationship between vagal tone and event-related potentials in response to an affective picture task. Social Neuroscience 2010, 6:48-62.
  • [19]Schacht A, Sommer W: Emotions in word and face processing: early and late cortical responses. Brain Cogn 2009, 69:538-550.
  • [20]Fruhholz S, Fehr T, Herrmann M: Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect. Int J Psychophysiol 2009, 74:1-13.
  • [21]Gonzalez-Garrido AA, Ramos-Loyo J, Lopez-Franco AL, Gomez-Velazquez FR: Visual processing in a facial emotional context: an ERP study. Int J Psychophysiol 2009, 71:25-30.
  • [22]Righart R, De Gelder B: Recognition of facial expressions is influenced by emotional scene gist. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2008, 8:264-272.
  • [23]Simon G, Bernard C, Largy P, Lalonde R, Rebai M: Chronometry of visual word recognition during passive and lexical decision tasks: an ERP investigation. Int J Neurosci 2004, 114:1401-1432.
  • [24]Scott GG, O'Donnell PJ, Leuthold H, Sereno SC: Early emotion word processing: evidence from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 2009, 80:95-104.
  • [25]Cunningham WA, Espinet SD, DeYoung CG, Zelazo PD: Attitudes to the right- and left: frontal ERP asymmetries associated with stimulus valence and processing goals. Neuroimage 2005, 28:827-834.
  • [26]Werheid K, Alpay G, Jentzsch I, Sommer W: Priming emotional facial expressions as evidenced by event-related brain potentials. Int J Psychophysiol 2005, 55:209-219.
  • [27]Codispoti M, Ferrari V, Junghofer M, Schupp HT: The categorization of natural scenes: brain attention networks revealed by dense sensor ERPs. Neuroimage 2006, 32:583-591.
  • [28]Dillon DG, Cooper JJ, Grent-'t-Jong T, Woldorff MG, LaBar KS: Dissociation of event-related potentials indexing arousal and semantic cohesion during emotional word encoding. Brain Cogn 2006, 62:43-57.
  • [29]Gonzalez R, Lopez V, Haye A, Hurtado E, Navarro A, Ibañez A: N170 and LPP discrimination of same raze versus other raze facial stimuli and positive and negative words in indigenous and non-indigenous participants. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008, 119:e155.
  • [30]Guex R, Ceric F, Hurtado E, Navarro A, Gonzalez R, Manes F, Ibanez A: Performance errors of ingroup/outgroup stimuli and valence association in the implicit association task: Brain bias of ingroup favoritism. Open Neurosci J 2011, in press.
  • [31]Hurtado E, Haye A, Gonzalez R, Manes F, Ibañez AM: Contextual blending of ingroup/outgroup face stimuli and word valence: LPP modulation and convergence of measures. BMC Neurosci 2009, 10:69. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [32]Ibáñez A, Gleichgerrcht E, Hurtado E, González R, Haye A, Manes F: Early Neural Markers of Implicit Attitudes: N170 Modulated by Intergroup and Evaluative Contexts in IAT. Front Human Neurosci 4:188.
  • [33]Codispoti M, Ferrari V, Bradley MM: Repetition and event-related potentials: distinguishing early and late processes in affective picture perception. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:577-586.
  • [34]Olofsson JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J: Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol 2008, 77:247-265.
  • [35]Rozenkrants B, Polich J: Affective ERP processing in a visual oddball task: arousal, valence, and gender. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:2260-2265.
  • [36]Petroni A, Urquina H, Guex R, Hurtado E, Manes F, Sigman M, Ibañez A: Early cortical measures of valence, stimulus type discrimination and interference: association to executive function and social cognition. , in press.
  • [37]Ibáñez A, Petroni A, Urquina H, Torralva T, Torrente F, Hurtado E, Guex R, Sigman M, Lischinsky A, Manes F: Cortical deficits in emotion processing for faces in adults with ADHD: Its relation to social cognition and executive functioning. , in press.
  • [38]Ekman P, Friesen WV, Ellsworth P: What emotion categories or dimensions can observers judge from facial behavior? In Emotion in the human face. Edited by Ekman P. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982:39-55.
  • [39]Bentin S, Peled BS: The contribution of task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags. Mem Cognit 1990, 18:359-366.
  • [40]De Houwer J: A Structural and Process Analysis of the Implicit Association Test. J Exp Soc Psychol 2001, 37:443-451.
  • [41]Rothermund K, Wentura D: Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations. J Exp Psychol Gen 2004, 133:139-165.
  • [42]Ashley V, Swick D: Consequences of emotional stimuli: Age differences on pure and mixed blocks of the emotional Stroop. Behav Brain Funct 2009, 5:14. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [43]Dong G, Hu Y, Zhou H: Event-related potential measures of the intending process: time course and related ERP components. Behav.Brain Funct 2010, 6:15. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [44]Maurer U, Brandeis D, McCandliss B: Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response. Behav Brain Funct 2005, 1:1-13. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [45]Simon G, Petit L, Bernard C, Rebai M: N170 ERPs could represent a logographic processing strategy in visual word recognition. Behav Brain Funct 2007, 3:21. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [46]Zhu XR, Zhang HJ, Wu TT, Luo WB, Luo YJ: Emotional conflict occurs at an early stage: evidence from the emotional face-word Stroop task. Neurosci Lett 2010, 478:1-4.
  • [47]Ito TA, Bartholow BD: The neural correlates of race. Trends Cogn Sci 2009, 13:524-531.
  • [48]Tsao DY, Livingstone MS: Mechanisms of face perception. Annu Rev Neurosci 2008, 31:411-437.
  • [49]Doyle MC, Rugg MD: Word repetition within- and across-visual fields: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:1403-1415.
  • [50]Rugg MD: Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Mem Cognit 1990, 18:367-379.
  • [51]Rugg MD, Pearl S, Walker P, Roberts RC, Holdstock JS: Word repetition effects on event-related potentials in healthy young and old subjects, and in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:381-398.
  • [52]Rugg MD, Mark RE, Gilchrist J, Roberts RC: ERP repetition effects in indirect and direct tasks: effects of age and interitem lag. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:572-586.
  • [53]Astikainen P, Hietanen JK: Event-related potentials to task-irrelevant changes in facial expressions. Behav Brain Funct 2009, 5:30. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [54]Cornejo C, Simonetti F, Ibanez A, Aldunate N, Ceric F, Lopez V, et al.: Gesture and metaphor comprehension: electrophysiological evidence of cross-modal coordination by audiovisual stimulation. Brain Cogn 2009, 70:42-52.
  • [55]Ibáñez A, Manes F, Escobar J, Trujillo N, Andreucci P, Hurtado E: Gesture influences the processing of figurative language in non-native speakers: ERP evidence. Neurosci Lett 2010, 471:48-52.
  • [56]Wong TK, Fung PC, McAlonan GM, Chua SE: Spatiotemporal dipole source localization of face processing ERPs in adolescents: a preliminary study. Behav Brain Funct 2009, 5:16. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [57]Lopez V, Lopez-Calderon J, Ortega R, Kreither J, Carrasco X, Rothhammer P, et al.: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder involves differential cortical processing in a visual spatial attention paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:2540-2548.
  • [58]Maurer U, Bucher K, Brem S, Benz R, Kranz F, Schulz E, et al.: Neurophysiology in preschool improves behavioral prediction of reading ability throughout primary school. Biol Psychiatry 2009, 66:341-348.
  • [59]Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR: Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003, 85:197-216.
  • [60]Mierke J, Klauer KC: Method-specific variance in the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003, 85:1180-1192.
  • [61]Oken BS, Chiappa KH: Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography. Ann Neurol 1986, 19:493-497.
  • [62]Arkes HR, Tetlock PE: Attributions of Implicite Prejudice, or "Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association Test?". Psychological Inquiry 2004, 15:257-278.
  • [63]Conrey FR, Sherman JW, Gawronski B, Hugenberg K, Groom CJ: Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005, 89:469-487.
  • [64]Hamann S, Canli T: Individual differences in emotion processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004, 14:233-238.
  • [65]Kinoshita S, Peek-O'Leary M: Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test reflect familiarity or affect? Psychon Bull Rev 2005, 12:442-452.
  • [66]De Houwer J: The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learn Behav 2009, 37:1-20.
  • [67]De Houwer J: A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Edited by Musch J, Klauer KC. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003:219-244.
  • [68]Zurron M, Pouso M, Lindin M, Galdo S, Diaz F: Event-related potentials with the Stroop colour-word task: timing of semantic conflict. Int J Psychophysiol 2009, 72:246-252.
  • [69]Carter CS, Van Veen V: Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2007, 7:367-379.
  • [70]Egner T, Hirsch J: The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. Neuroimage 2005, 24:539-547.
  • [71]Markela-Lerenc J, Ille N, Kaiser S, Fiedler P, Mundt C, Weisbrod M: Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first? Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004, 18:278-287.
  • [72]Simon JR, Rudell AP: Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 1967, 51:300-304.
  • [73]Melara RD, Wang H, Vu KP, Proctor RW: Attentional origins of the Simon effect: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Brain Res 2008, 1215:147-159.
  • [74]Hanslmayr S, Pastotter B, Bauml KH, Gruber S, Wimber M, Klimesch W: The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20:215-225.
  • [75]Grossmann T: The development of emotion perception in face and voice during infancy. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2010, 28:219-236.
  • [76]Ohman A, Mineka S: Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychol Rev 2001, 108:483-522.
  • [77]Aravena P, Hurtado E, Riveros R, Cardona JF, Manes F, Ibáñez A: Applauding with closed hands: neural signature of action-sentence compatibility effects. PLoS One 2010, 5:e11751.
  • [78]Barutta J, Cornejo C, Ibáñez A: Theories and theorizers: a contextual approach to theories of cognition. Integr Psychol Behav Sci 2011.
  • [79]Cosmelli D, Ibáñez A: Human cognition in context: on the biologic, cognitive and social reconsideration of meaning as making sense of action. Integr Psychol Behav Sci 2008, 42:233-244.
  • [80]Gleichgerrcht E, Ibanez A, Roca M, Torralva T, Manes F: Decision Making Cognition in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Nat Rev Neurol 2010, 6:611-623.
  • [81]Ibáñez A, Lopez V, Cornejo C: ERPs and contextual semantic discrimination: degrees of congruence in wakefulness and sleep. Brain Lang 2006, 98:264-275.
  • [82]Ibáñez A, Haye A, González R, Hurtado E, Henríquez R: Multi-level analysis of cultural phenomena: The role of ERP approach to prejudice. J Theor Soc Behav 2010, 39:81-110.
  • [83]Ibáñez A, Riveros R, Aravena P, Vergara V, Cardona JF, Garcia L, et al.: When context is difficult to integrate: Cortical measures of congruency in schizophrenics and healthy relatives from multiplex families. Schizophr Res 2011, 126:303-305.
  • [84]Ibáñez A, Toro P, Cornejo C, Hurquina H, Manes F, Weisbrod M, et al.: High contextual sensitivity of metaphorical expressions and gesture blending: A video event-related potential design. Psychiatry Res 2011, 191:68-75.
  • [85]Riveros R, Manes F, Hurtado E, Escobar M, Martin RM, Cetkovich M, et al.: Context-sensitive social cognition is impaired in schizophrenic patients and their healthy relatives. Schizophr Res 2010, 116:297-298.
  • [86]San Martin R, Manes F, Hurtado E, Isla P, Ibáñez A: Size and probability of rewards modulate the feedback error-related negativity associated with wins but not losses in a monetarily rewarded gambling task. Neuroimage 2010, 51:1194-1204.
  • [87]Labuschagne I, Croft RJ, Phan KL, Nathan PJ: Augmenting serotonin neurotransmission with citalopram modulates emotional expression decoding but not structural encoding of moderate intensity sad facial emotional stimuli: an event-related potential (ERP) investigation. J Psychopharmacol 2010, 24:1153-64.
  • [88]Ito TA, Thompson E, Cacioppo JT: Tracking the timecourse of social perception: the effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2004, 30:1267-1280.
  • [89]Maurer U, Rossion B, McCandliss BD: Category specificity in early perception: face and word n170 responses differ in both lateralization and habituation properties. Front Hum Neurosci 2008, 2:18.
  • [90]Schupp HT, Junghofer M, Weike AI, Hamm AO: The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: an ERP analysis. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:441-449.
  • [91]Vuilleumier P, Pourtois G: Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:174-194.
  • [92]Fischler I, Bradley M: Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: words, phrases, and task effects. Prog Brain Res 2006, 156:185-203.
  • [93]Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E: Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003, 17:637-650.
  • [94]Proverbio AM, Del ZM, Zani A: The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition. BMC Neurosci 2007, 8:24. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [95]Segalowitz SJ, Zheng X: An ERP study of category priming: evidence of early lexical semantic access. Biol Psychol 2009, 80:122-129.
  • [96]Brendan M, Aidman E: Individual Differences in Implicit and Declared Self-Esteem as Predictors of Response to Negative Performance Evaluation: Validating Implicit Association Test as a Measure of Self-Attitudes. Int J Test 2004, 4:19-42.
  • [97]De Houwer J, Teige-Mocigemba S, Spruyt A, Moors A: Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychol Bull 2009, 135:347-368.
  • [98]Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL: Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998, 74:1464-1480.
  • [99]Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR: Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 2009, 97:17-41.
  • [100]Bradley MM, Hamby S, Low A, Lang PJ: Brain potentials in perception: picture complexity and emotional arousal. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:364-373.
  • [101]Cano ME, Class QA, Polich J: Affective valence, stimulus attributes, and P300: color vs. black/white and normal vs. scrambled images. Int J Psychophysiol 2009, 71:17-24.
  • [102]Delplanque S, N'diaye K, Scherer K, Grandjean D: Spatial frequencies or emotional effects? A systematic measure of spatial frequencies for IAPS pictures by a discrete wavelet analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2007, 165:144-150.
  • [103]Rozenkrants B, Olofsson JK, Polich J: Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, valence, and repetition effects for normal and distorted pictures. Int J Psychophysiol 2008, 67:114-123.
  • [104]Bradley MM, Codispoti M, Cuthbert BN, Lang PJ: Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion 2001, 1:276-298.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:31次 浏览次数:28次