Neonatal outcomes in relation to sex differences: a national cohort survey in Taiwan

Biology of Sex Differences

Yi-Hao Weng¹  Chun-Yuh Yang³  Ya-Wen Chiu² 

[1] Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 199 Dunhua North Road, Taipei 105, Taiwan

[2] Master Program in Global Health and Development, Health Policy and Care Research Center, College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei 110, Taiwan

[3] Department of Public Health, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan

关键词: Congenital anomaly;    Birth outcome;    Gestational age;    Birth weight;    Cesarean section;    Gender;    Sex ratio;   

Others  :  1234985
DOI  :  10.1186/s13293-015-0052-8

 received in 2015-08-21, accepted in 2015-12-04,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

An extensive assessment investigating the association between sex differences and neonatal outcomes is lacking. In the current study, we estimated the correlation of gender with adverse birth outcomes in a large cohort population.

Methods

National population-based data containing maternal and neonatal information in 2001 to 2010 were derived from the Health Promotion Administration, Taiwan. Singletons without high-risk pregnancy were further analyzed for the sex ratio of live births in relation to neonatal outcomes—including preterm birth, birth weight, neonatal death, delivery mode, and congenital anomaly. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to adjust for possible confounders.

Results

In total, 2,123,100 births were valid for the analysis. Overall, the sex ratio at birth (male/female) was 1.096. Compared to multiple births, the sex ratio was significantly higher with singleton births (p < 0.001). Among multiple births, the incidence of stillbirths was significantly higher in males than in females (p < 0.05). The sex ratio at gestational age (GA) <37 weeks was 1.332, and it declined proportionally with a rise in the GA to 0.899 at GA of ≥41 weeks. In contrast, the sex ratio was 0.850 at birth weight <3000 g, and it rose proportionally with a rise in the birth weight to 1.902 at birth weight ≥4000 g (macrosomia). Operative delivery was more common in males than in females (p < 0.001). The regression analysis showed greater risks of preterm birth, macrosomia, operative delivery, neonatal death, and congenital anomaly among male newborns.

Conclusions

Male gender carried higher risks of adverse neonatal outcomes, including preterm birth, macrosomia, operative delivery, neonatal death, and congenital anomaly. The data have clinical implications on health surveillance for plotting strategies in response to the unbalanced sex ratio in relation to the boy preference.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Weng et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Pham BN, Hall W, Hill PS, Rao C. Analysis of socio-political and health practices influencing sex ratio at birth in Viet Nam. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16(32):176-84.
• [2]Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Trend analysis of the sex ratio at birth in the United States. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005; 53(20):1-17.
• [3]Pavic D. Factors affecting sex ratio at birth in Croatia 1998–2008. J Biosoc Sci. 2012; 44(3):357-64.
• [4]Rueness J, Vatten L, Eskild A. The human sex ratio: effects of maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(1):283-7.
• [5]Garenne M. Poisson variations of the sex ratio at birth in African demographic surveys. Hum Biol. 2008; 80(5):473-82.
• [6]Rosenfeld CS, Roberts RM. Maternal diet and other factors affecting offspring sex ratio: a review. Biol Reprod. 2004; 71(4):1063-70.
• [7]Yang CY, Tsai SS, Cheng BH, Hsu TY, Wu TN. Sex ratio at birth associated with petrochemical air pollution in Taiwan. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2000; 65(1):126-31.
• [8]Gibson MA, Mace R. Strong mothers bear more sons in rural Ethiopia. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270 Suppl 1:S108-9.
• [9]Song S. Does famine influence sex ratio at birth? Evidence from the 1959–1961 Great Leap Forward Famine in China. Proc Biol Sci. 2012; 279(1739):2883-90.
• [10]Song S. Evidence of adaptive intergenerational sex ratio adjustment in contemporary human populations. Theor Popul Biol. 2014; 92:14-21.
• [11]Helle S, Helama S, Lertola K. Evolutionary ecology of human birth sex ratio under the compound influence of climate change, famine, economic crises and wars. J Anim Ecol. 2009; 78(6):1226-33.
• [12]Terrell ML, Hartnett KP, Marcus M. Can environmental or occupational hazards alter the sex ratio at birth? A systematic review. Emerg Health Threats J. 2011; 4:7109.
• [13]Wallner B, Fieder M, Seidler H. Ownership of dwelling affects the sex ratio at birth in Uganda. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12):e51463.
• [14]Maalouf WE, Mincheva MN, Campbell BK, Hardy IC. Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on human sex ratio at birth. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(5):1321-5.
• [15]Madan K, Breuning MH. Impact of prenatal technologies on the sex ratio in India: an overview. Genet Med. 2014; 16(6):425-32.
• [16]Khalil MM, Alzahra E: Fetal gender and pregnancy outcomes in Libya: a retrospective study. Libyan J Med. 2013, 8 doi:. 10. 3402/ljm.v8i0.20008 webcite
• [17]Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Hershkovitz R, Leron E, Mazor M. Gender does matter in perinatal medicine. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004; 19(4):366-9.
• [18]Eogan MA, Geary MP, O’Connell MP, Keane DP. Effect of fetal sex on labour and delivery: retrospective review. BMJ. 2003; 326(7381):137.
• [19]Weng YH, Yang CY, Chiu YW. Risk assessment of adverse birth outcomes in relation to maternal age. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114843.
• [20]Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Sun L, Troendle J, Willinger M, Zhang J. Prepregnancy risk factors for antepartum stillbirth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(5):1119-26.
• [21]Hoa DT, Borjesson L, Nga NT, Johansson A, Malqvist M. Sex of newborns associated with place and mode of delivery: a population-based study in northern Vietnam. Genet Med. 2012; 9(6):418-23.
• [22]Catalano R, Bruckner T, Anderson E, Gould JB. Fetal death sex ratios: a test of the economic stress hypothesis. Int J Epidemiol. 2005; 34(4):944-8.
• [23]Melamed N, Yogev Y, Glezerman M. Fetal gender and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23(4):338-44.
• [24]Sokal R, Tata LJ, Fleming KM. Sex prevalence of major congenital anomalies in the United Kingdom: a national population-based study and international comparison meta-analysis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2014; 100(2):79-91.
• [25]Tennant PW, Samarasekera SD, Pless-Mulloli T, Rankin J. Sex differences in the prevalence of congenital anomalies: a population-based study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011; 91(10):894-901.
• [26]Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Kaidarova Z, Harris JA. Differential risks to males and females for congenital malformations among 2.5 million California births, 1989–1997. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003; 67(12):953-8.
• [27]Lary JM, Paulozzi LJ. Sex differences in the prevalence of human birth defects: a population-based study. Teratology. 2001; 64(5):237-51.
• [28]Sheiner E. The relationship between fetal gender and pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007; 275(5):317-9.
• [29]Viegas OA, Lee PS, Lim KJ, Ravichandran J. Male fetuses are associated with increased risk for cesarean delivery in Malaysian nulliparae. Medscape J Med. 2008; 10(12):276.
• [30]Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Silberstein T, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M. Failed vacuum extraction. Maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med. 2001; 46(9):819-24.
• [31]Tse WC, Leung KY, Hung BK. Trend of sex ratio at birth in a public hospital in Hong Kong from 2001 to 2010. Hong Kong Med J. 2013; 19(4):305-10.
• [32]Lo JC. Patients’ attitudes vs. physicians’ determination: implications for cesarean sections. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57(1):91-6.
• [33]Hsu KH, Liao PJ, Hwang CJ. Factors affecting Taiwanese women’s choice of Cesarean section. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 66(1):201-9.
• [34]Titaley CR, Dibley MJ, Agho K, Roberts CL, Hall J. Determinants of neonatal mortality in Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8:232. BioMed Central Full Text
• [35]Alonso V, Fuster V, Luna F. Causes of neonatal mortality in Spain (1975–98): influence of sex, rural-urban residence and age at death. J Biosoc Sci. 2006; 38(4):537-51.
• [36]Glass HC, Costarino AT, Stayer SA, Brett CM, Cladis F, Davis PJ. Outcomes for extremely premature infants. Anesth Analg. 2015; 120(6):1337-51.
• [37]Khoury MJ, Marks JS, McCarthy BJ, Zaro SM. Factors affecting the sex differential in neonatal mortality: the role of respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151(6):777-82.
• [38]Jacobsen R, Moller H, Mouritsen A. Natural variation in the human sex ratio. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(12):3120-5.
• [39]Pollard GN. Factors influencing the sex ratio at birth in Australia, 1902–65. J Biosoc Sci. 1969; 1(2):125-44.
• [40]Rydhstrom H. The effects of maternal age, parity, and sex of the twins on twin perinatal mortality. A population based study. Acta Genet Med Gemellol. 1990; 39(3):401-8.
• [41]Zahalkova M. Perinatal and infant mortality in twins. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1978; 24(Pt B):115-20.
• [42]Sahni M, Verma N, Narula D, Varghese RM, Sreenivas V, Puliyel JM. Missing girls in India: infanticide, feticide and made-to-order pregnancies? Insights from hospital-based sex-ratio-at-birth over the last century. PLoS One. 2008; 3(5):e2224.
• [43]George SM. Millions of missing girls: from fetal sexing to high technology sex selection in India. Prenat Diagn. 2006; 26(7):604-9.
• [44]Hesketh T, Xing ZW. Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(36):13271-5.
• [45]Miller BD. Female-selective abortion in Asia: patterns, policies, and debates. Am Anthropol. 2001; 103(4):1083-95.
• [46]Wu Z, Viisainen K, Hemminki E. Determinants of high sex ratio among newborns: a cohort study from rural Anhui province. China Reprod Health Matters. 2006; 14(27):172-80.
• [47]Jha P, Kesler MA, Kumar R, Ram F, Ram U, Aleksandrowicz L et al.. Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. Lancet. 2011; 377(9781):1921-8.
• [48]Guilmoto CZ, Hoang X, Van TN. Recent increase in sex ratio at birth in Viet Nam. PLoS One. 2009; 4(2):e4624.
• [49]Chen LC, Chen CY, Horng HC, Yen MS, Wang PH, Chen CP et al.. Sex ratio at a tertiary medical center in northern Taiwan—an analysis of amniocentesis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 53(1):118-9.
• [50]Lee IW, Lai YC, Kuo PL, Chang CM. Human sex ratio at amniocentesis and at birth in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 51(4):572-5.
• [51]Yang CY, Cheng BH, Tsai SS, Wu TN, Hsu TY, Lin KC. Chlorination of drinking water and sex ratio at birth in Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2000; 60(7):471-6.
• [52]Lin CM, Lee PC, Teng SW, Lu TH, Mao IF, Li CY. Validation of the Taiwan Birth Registry using obstetric records. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004; 103(4):297-301.
• [53]Hwang BF, Jaakkola JJ. Risk of stillbirth in the relation to water disinfection by-products: a population-based case-control study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e33949.