| BMC Cancer | |
| DNA methylation gene-based models indicating independent poor outcome in prostate cancer | |
| Nataša Vasiljević4  Amar S Ahmad4  Mangesh A Thorat4  Gabrielle Fisher4  Daniel M Berney3  Henrik Møller1  Christopher S Foster2  Jack Cuzick4  Attila T Lorincz4  | |
| [1] King’s College London, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, London SE1 9RT, UK | |
| [2] HCA International Pathology Laboratories, 2-22 Capper Street, London WC1E 6JA, UK | |
| [3] Molecular Oncology Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK | |
| [4] Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK | |
| 关键词: Pyrosequencing; Watchful waiting; Progression biomarkers; Prostate cancer; DNA methylation; | |
| Others : 1121103 DOI : 10.1186/1471-2407-14-655 |
|
| received in 2014-03-16, accepted in 2014-08-30, 发布年份 2014 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
Prostate cancer has a variable clinical behaviour with frequently unpredictable outcome. DNA methylation plays an important role in determining the biology of cancer but prognostic information is scanty. We assessed the potential of gene-specific DNA methylation changes to predict death from prostate cancer in a cohort of untreated men in the UK.
Methods
This was a population-based study in which cases were identified from six cancer registries in Great Britain. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin wax-embedded transurethral prostate resection tissues collected during 1990-96 from men with clinically-localised cancer who chose not to be treated for at least 6 months following diagnosis. The primary end point was death from prostate cancer. Outcomes were determined through medical records and cancer registry records. Pyrosequencing was used to quantify methylation in 13 candidate genes with established or suggested roles in cancer. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to identify possible predictors for prostate cancer-related death.
Results
Of 367 men, 99 died from prostate cancer during a median of 9.5 years follow-up (max = 20). Univariately, 12 genes were significantly associated with prostate cancer mortality, hazard ratios ranged between 1.09 and 1.28 per decile increase in methylation. Stepwise Cox regression modelling suggested that the methylation of genes HSPB1, CCND2 and DPYS contributed objective prognostic information to Gleason score and PSA with respect to cancer-related death during follow-up (p = 0.006).
Conclusion
Methylation of 13 genes was analysed in 367 men with localised prostate cancer who were conservatively treated and stratified with respect to death from prostate cancer and those who survived or died of other causes. Of the 13 genes analysed, differential methylation of HSPB1, CCND2 and DPYS provided independent prognostic information. Assessment of gene-methylation may provide independent objective information that can be used to segregate prostate cancers at diagnosis into predicted behavioural groups.
【 授权许可】
2014 Vasiljevic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150211021032516.pdf | 883KB | ||
| Figure 3. | 91KB | Image | |
| Figure 2. | 83KB | Image | |
| Figure 1. | 79KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Cuzick J, Fisher G, Kattan MW, Berney D, Oliver T, Foster CS, Moller H, Reuter V, Fearn P, Eastham J, Scardino P, Transatlantic Prostate Group: Long-term outcome among men with conservatively treated localised prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2006, 95(9):1186-1194.
- [2]Egevad L, Ahmad AS, Algaba F, Berney DM, Boccon-Gibod L, Comperat E, Evans AJ, Griffiths D, Grobholz R, Kristiansen G, Langner C, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Moss S, Oliveira P, Vainer B, Varma M, Camparo P: Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists. Histopathology 2013, 62(2):247-256.
- [3]Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E: Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med 1987, 317(15):909-916.
- [4]Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Berenguer A, Maattanen L, Bangma CH, Aus G, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Blijenberg BG, Moss SM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Investigators E: Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 2009, 360(13):1320-1328.
- [5]Moore AL, Dimitropoulou P, Lane A, Powell PH, Greenberg DC, Brown CH, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Martin RM, Neal DE: Population-based prostate-specific antigen testing in the UK leads to a stage migration of prostate cancer. BJU Int 2009, 104(11):1592-1598.
- [6]Foster CS, Cooper CS: Urgent need to develop independent biomarkers for functional, diagnostic and prognostic application in oncology research. Biomark Med 2009, 3(4):329-333.
- [7]Cedar H, Bergman Y: Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10(5):295-304.
- [8]Herman JG, Baylin SB: Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med 2003, 349(21):2042-2054.
- [9]Yang M, Park JY: DNA methylation in promoter region as biomarkers in prostate cancer. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 863:67-109.
- [10]Rodriguez-Paredes M, Esteller M: Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat Med 2011, 17(3):330-339.
- [11]Berdasco M, Esteller M: Aberrant epigenetic landscape in cancer: how cellular identity goes awry. Dev Cell 2010, 19(5):698-711.
- [12]Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Matveev VB, Schmid HP, Zattoni F: EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008, 53(1):68-80.
- [13]Jeronimo C, Henrique R: Epigenetic biomarkers in urological tumors: a systematic review. Cancer Lett 2014, 342(2):264-274.
- [14]Nelson WG, Yegnasubramanian S, Agoston AT, Bastian PJ, Lee BH, Nakayama M, De Marzo AM: Abnormal DNA methylation, epigenetics, and prostate cancer. Front Biosci 2007, 12:4254-4266.
- [15]Vanaja DK, Ehrich M, Van den Boom D, Cheville JC, Karnes RJ, Tindall DJ, Cantor CR, Young CY: Hypermethylation of genes for diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer. Cancer Invest 2009, 27(5):549-560.
- [16]Banez LL, Sun L, van Leenders GJ, Wheeler TM, Bangma CH, Freedland SJ, Ittmann MM, Lark AL, Madden JF, Hartman A, Weiss G, Castanos-Velez E: Multicenter clinical validation of PITX2 methylation as a prostate specific antigen recurrence predictor in patients with post-radical prostatectomy prostate cancer. J Urol 2010, 184(1):149-156.
- [17]Liu L, Kron KJ, Pethe VV, Demetrashvili N, Nesbitt ME, Trachtenberg J, Ozcelik H, Fleshner NE, Briollais L, van der Kwast TH, Bapat B: Association of tissue promoter methylation levels of APC, TGFbeta2, HOXD3 and RASSF1A with prostate cancer progression. Int J Cancer 2011, 129(10):2454-2462.
- [18]Buffart TE, Overmeer RM, Steenbergen RD, Tijssen M, van Grieken NC, Snijders PJ, Grabsch HI, van de Velde CJ, Carvalho B, Meijer GA: MAL promoter hypermethylation as a novel prognostic marker in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2008, 99(11):1802-1807.
- [19]Vasiljevic N, Ahmad AS, Beesley C, Thorat MA, Fisher G, Berney DM, Moller H, Yu Y, Lu YJ, Cuzick J, Foster CS, Lorincz AT: Association between DNA methylation of HSPB1 and death in low Gleason score prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2012, 16(1):35-40.
- [20]Vasiljevic N, Wu K, Brentnall AR, Kim DC, Thorat M, Kudahetti SC, Mao X, Xue L, Yu Y, Shaw GL, Beltran L, Lu YJ, Berney DM, Cuzick J, Lorincz AT: Absolute quantitation of DNA methylation of 28 candidate genes in prostate cancer using pyrosequencing. Dis Markers 2011, 30(4):151-161.
- [21]Richiardi L, Fiano V, Vizzini L, De Marco L, Delsedime L, Akre O, Tos AG, Merletti F: Promoter methylation in APC, RUNX3, and GSTP1 and mortality in prostate cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27(19):3161-3168.
- [22]Rosenbaum E, Hoque MO, Cohen Y, Zahurak M, Eisenberger MA, Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sidransky D: Promoter hypermethylation as an independent prognostic factor for relapse in patients with prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11(23):8321-8325.
- [23]Kloth M, Goering W, Ribarska T, Arsov C, Sorensen KD, Schulz WA: The SNP rs6441224 influences transcriptional activity and prognostically relevant hypermethylation of RARRES1 in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2012, 131(6):E897-E904.
- [24]Glinsky GV, Glinskii AB, Stephenson AJ, Hoffman RM, Gerald WL: Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of prostate cancer. J Clin Invest 2004, 113(6):913-923.
- [25]Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymomd L, Young J: Cancer Incidence in five continents. IARC Scientific Publication no 155 2002.
- [26]Mao X, Yu Y, Boyd LK, Ren G, Lin D, Chaplin T, Kudahetti SC, Stankiewicz E, Xue L, Beltran L, Gupta M, Oliver RT, Lemoine NR, Berney DM, Young BD, Lu YJ: Distinct genomic alterations in prostate cancers in Chinese and western populations suggest alternative pathways of prostate carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2010, 70(13):5207-5212.
- [27]McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM: REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006, 100(2):229-235.
- [28]Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser 1995, 57(1):289-300.
- [29]Erfon B, Tibshirani R: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1993.
- [30]Cornford PA, Dodson AR, Parsons KF, Desmond AD, Woolfenden A, Fordham M, Neoptolemos JP, Ke Y, Foster CS: Heat shock protein expression independently predicts clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2000, 60(24):7099-7105.
- [31]Foster CS, Dodson AR, Ambroisine L, Fisher G, Moller H, Clark J, Attard G, De-Bono J, Scardino P, Reuter VE, Cooper CS, Berney DM, Cuzick J: Hsp-27 expression at diagnosis predicts poor clinical outcome in prostate cancer independent of ETS-gene rearrangement. Br J Cancer 2009, 101(7):1137-1144.
- [32]Henrique R, Ribeiro FR, Fonseca D, Hoque MO, Carvalho AL, Costa VL, Pinto M, Oliveira J, Teixeira MR, Sidransky D, Jeronimo C: High promoter methylation levels of APC predict poor prognosis in sextant biopsies from prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13(20):6122-6129.
- [33]Chung W, Kwabi-Addo B, Ittmann M, Jelinek J, Shen L, Yu Y, Issa JP: Identification of novel tumor markers in prostate, colon and breast cancer by unbiased methylation profiling. PLoS One 2008, 3(4):e2079.
- [34]Hessels D, Verhaegh GW, Schalken JA, Witjes JA: Applicability of biomarkers in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2004, 4(4):513-526.
- [35]Mehra R, Tomlins SA, Yu J, Cao X, Wang L, Menon A, Rubin MA, Pienta KJ, Shah RB, Chinnaiyan AM: Characterization of TMPRSS2-ETS gene aberrations in androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2008, 68(10):3584-3590.
- [36]Berney DM, Gopalan A, Kudahetti S, Fisher G, Ambroisine L, Foster CS, Reuter V, Eastham J, Moller H, Kattan MW, Gerald W, Cooper C, Scardino P, Cuzick J: Ki-67 and outcome in clinically localised prostate cancer: analysis of conservatively treated prostate cancer patients from the Trans-Atlantic Prostate Group study. Br J Cancer 2009, 100(6):888-893.
- [37]Cuzick J, Swanson GP, Fisher G, Brothman AR, Berney DM, Reid JE, Mesher D, Speights VO, Stankiewicz E, Foster CS, Moller H, Scardino P, Warren JD, Park J, Younus A, Flake DD 2nd, Wagner S, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS, Stone S, Transatlantic Prostate G: Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 2011, 12(3):245-255.
PDF