Understanding and defining bullying – adolescents’ own views

Archives of Public Health

Lisa Hellström¹  Louise Persson¹  Curt Hagquist¹ 

[1] Centre for Research on Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Karlstad University, Karlstad, SE 651 88, Sweden

关键词: Qualitative content analysis;    Definition;    Bullying;    Adolescents;   

Others  :  1140418
DOI  :  10.1186/2049-3258-73-4

 received in 2014-07-04, accepted in 2014-10-28,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The negative consequences of peer-victimization on children and adolescents are major public health concerns which have been subjected to extensive research. Given all efforts made to analyze and estimate the social and health consequences of peer-victimization, the adolescents’ own experiences and understandings have had surprisingly little impact on the definition of bullying. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to explore adolescents’ definitions of bullying.

Methods

A questionnaire study (n = 128) and four focus group interviews (n = 21) were conducted among students aged 13 and 15. First, gender and age differences were analyzed with respect to what behaviors are considered bullying (questionnaire data). Second, analysis of what bullying is (focus group interviews) was conducted using qualitative content analysis.

Results

The adolescents own understanding and definition of bullying didn’t just include the traditional criteria of repetition and power imbalance, but also a criterion based on the health consequences of bullying. The results showed that a single but hurtful or harmful incident also could be considered bullying irrespective of whether the traditional criteria were fulfilled or not. Further, girls and older students had a more inclusive view of bullying and reported more types of behaviors as bullying compared to boys and younger students.

Conclusions

The results of the current study adds to the existing literature by showing that adolescents consider the victim’s experience of hurt and harm as a criterion for defining bullying and not only as consequences of bullying. This may be of special relevance for the identification and classification of bullying incidents on the internet where devastating consequences have been reported from single incidents and the use of the traditional criteria of intent, repetition and power imbalance may not be as relevant as for traditional bullying. It implies that the traditional criteria included in most definitions of bullying may not fully reflect adolescents’ understanding and definition of bullying. Assessments of bullying behaviors that ask adolescents to strictly adhere to the traditional definition of bullying might not identify all adolescents experiencing peer victimization and therefore not provide estimates of prevalence rates reflecting adolescents’ own understanding of bullying.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Hellström et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Nocentini A, Calmaestra J, Schultze-Krumbholz A, Scheithauer H, Ortega R, Menesini E: Cyberbullying: labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries. Aust J Guid Couns 2010, 20(02):129-42.
• [2]Dooley JJ, Pyżalski J, Cross D: Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying. Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol/J Psychol 2009, 217(4):182-8.
• [3]Bandura A: Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. 2nd edition. Edited by Bryant J, Zillman D. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001:121-53.
• [4]Kohm SA: Naming, shaming and criminal justice: mass-mediated humiliation as entertainment and punishment. Crime Media Culture 2009, 5(2):188-205.
• [5]Presdee M: Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime. Florence, KY: Routledge; 2000.
• [6]Swain J: What does bullying really mean? Educ Res 1998, 40(3):358-64.
• [7]Vaillancourt T, McDougall P, Hymel S, Krygsman A, Miller J, Stiver K, et al.: Bullying: are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? Int J Behav Dev 2008, 32(6):486-95.
• [8]Olweus D: Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers; 1993
• [9]Olweus D, Breivik K: Plight of victims of school bullying: The opposite of well-being. In Handbook of child well-being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective. Edited by Ben-Arieh A, Casas F, Frones I, Korbin JE. Heidelberg, Ger: Springer; 2013. In press
• [10]Finkelhor D, Turner HA, Hamby S: Let’s prevent peer victimization, not just bullying. Child Abuse Negl 2012, 36(4):271-4.
• [11]Eron LD: The development of aggressive behavior from the perspective of a developing behaviorism. Am Psychol 1987, 42(5):435-42.
• [12]Greif JL, Furlong MJ: The assessment of school bullying. J Sch Violence 2006, 5(3):33-50.
• [13]Green JG, Felix ED, Sharkey JD, Furlong MJ, Kras JE: Identifying bully victims: definitional versus behavioral approaches. Psychol Assess 2013, 25(2):651-7.
• [14]Rigby K: What international research tells us about bullying. In Bullying solutions: Evidence-based approaches to bullying in Australian schools. Edited by McGrath H, Noble T. Crowst Nest, NSW: Pearson Education; 2006:3-15.
• [15]Solberg ME, Olweus D: Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggress Behav 2003, 29(3):239-68.
• [16]Madsen K: Differing perceptions of bullying and their practical implications. Educ Child Psychol 1996, 13(2):14-22.
• [17]Guerin S, Hennessy E: Pupils’ definitions of bullying. Eur J Psychol 2002, 17(3):249-61.
• [18]Frisén A, Holmqvist K, Oscarsson D: 13-year-olds’ perception of bullying: definitions, reasons for victimisation and experience of adults’ response. Educ Stud 2008, 34(2):105-17.
• [19]Naylor P, Cowie H, Cossin F, de Bettencourt R, Lemme F: Teachers’ and pupils’ definitions of bullying. Br J Educ Psychol 2006, 76(3):553-76.
• [20]Thornberg R, Knutsen S: Teenagers’ explanations of bullying. Child Youth Care Forum 2011, 40(3):177-92.
• [21]Smith PK, Cowie H, Olafsson RF, Liefooghe AP, Almeida A, Araki H, et al.: Definitions of bullying: a comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen–country international comparison. Child Dev 2002, 73(4):1119-33.
• [22]Hopkins L, Taylor L, Bowen E, Wood C: A qualitative study investigating adolescents’ understanding of aggression, bullying and violence. Child Youth Serv Rev 2013, 35(4):685-93.
• [23]Maunder RE, Harrop A, Tattersall AJ: Pupil and staff perceptions of bullying in secondary schools: comparing behavioural definitions and their perceived seriousness. Educ Res 2010, 52(3):263-82.
• [24]Vandebosch H, Van Cleemput K: Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008, 11(4):499-503.
• [25]Sticca F, Ruggieri S, Alsaker F, Perren S: Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2013, 23(1):52-67.
• [26]Teräsahjo T, Salmivalli C: “She is not actually bullied”. The discourse of harassment in student groups. Aggress Behav 2003, 29(2):134-54.
• [27]Beckman L, Hagquist C, Hellström L: Does the association with psychosomatic health problems differ between cyberbullying and traditional bullying? Emotional Behav Difficulties 2012, 17(3–4):421-34.
• [28]Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Luk JW, Nansel TR: Co-occurrence of victimization from five subtypes of bullying: physical, verbal, social exclusion, spreading rumors, and cyber. J Pediatr Psychol 2010, 35(10):1103-12.
• [29]Thornberg R: ‘She’s weird!’—The social construction of bullying in school: a review of qualitative research. Children Soc 2011, 25(4):258-67.
• [30]Olweus D: The revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL): University of Bergen; 1996.
• [31]Bland JM, Altman DG: Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995, 310:170.
• [32]Graneheim UH, Lundman B: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004, 24(2):105-12.
• [33]Monks CP, Smith PK: Definitions of bullying: age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience. Brit J Dev Psychol 2006, 24(4):801-21.
• [34]Smith PK, Monks CP: Concepts of bullying: developmental and cultural aspects. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2008, 20(2):101-12.
• [35]Gamliel T, Hoover JH, Daughtry DW, Imbra CM: A qualitative investigation of bullying the perspectives of fifth, sixth and seventh graders in a USA parochial school. Sch Psychol Int 2003, 24(4):405-20.
• [36]Beckman L, Hagquist C, Hellström L: Discrepant gender patterns for cyberbullyiyng and traditional bullying–An analysis of swedish adolescent data. Comput Hum Behav 2013, 29(5):1896-903.
• [37]Erling A, Hwang CP: Swedish 10-year-old children’s perceptions and experiences of bullying. J Sch Violence 2004, 3(1):33-43.
• [38]Goldsmid S, Howie P: Bullying by definition: an examination of definitional components of bullying. Emotional Behav Difficulties 2014, 19(2):210-25.
• [39]Mishna F, Pepler D, Wiener J: Factors associated with perceptions and responses to bullying situations by children, parents, teachers, and principals. Victims Offenders 2006, 1(3):255-88.
• [40]Hinduja S, Patchin JW: Offline consequences of online victimization. J Sch Violence 2007, 6(3):89-112.
• [41]Campbell MA: Cyber bullying: an old problem in a new guise? Aust J Guid Couns 2005, 15(1):68-76.
• [42]Slonje R, Smith PK: Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scand J Psychol 2008, 49(2):147-54.
• [43]Aftonbladet News: Tonåringar åtalas efter instagram – upplopp i Göteborg [teens charged after instagram – riots in Gothenburg]. 2013. http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article16812884.ab webcite, Accessed May 21
• [44]Värmlands Folkblad News: Barnen tävlar om vem som är snyggast [the children compete to see who is the hottest]. 2013. http://www.vf.se/nyheter/karlstad/barnen-tavlar-om-vem-som-ar-snyggast webcite, Accessed July 1 2013
• [45]Varjas K, Meyers J, Bellmoff L, Lopp E, Birckbichler L, Marshall M: Missing voices: fourth through eighth grade urban students’ perceptions of bullying. J Sch Violence 2008, 7(4):97-118.
• [46]General Assembly: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Resolution 44/25 of November 1989. 1989.
• [47]Kitzinger J: The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn 1994, 16(1):103-21.
• [48]Horowitz JA, Vessey JA, Carlson KL, Bradley JF, Montoya C, McCullough B: Conducting school-based focus groups: lessons learned from the CATS project. J Pediatr Nurs 2003, 18(5):321-31.
• [49]Horner S: Using focus group methods with middle school children. Res Nurs Health 2000, 23(6):510-7.