Towards a metagenomic understanding on enhanced biomethane production from waste activated sludge after pH 10 pretreatment

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Mabel Ting Wong³  Dong Zhang²  Jun Li³  Raymond Kin Hi Hui³  Hein Min Tun³  Manreetpal Singh Brar³  Tae-Jin Park³  Yinguang Chen²  Frederick C Leung¹ 

[1] Bioinformatics Center, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China

[2] State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, China

[3] 5 N01, Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

关键词: Metagenomic;    Pyrosequencing;    Biomethane;    Renewable energy;    Pretreatment;    Sludge;    Wastewater treatment plant;   

Others  :  798123
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-6-38

 received in 2012-07-28, accepted in 2013-03-06,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Understanding the effects of pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of sludge waste from wastewater treatment plants is becoming increasingly important, as impetus moves towards the utilization of sludge for renewable energy production. Although the field of sludge pretreatment has progressed significantly over the past decade, critical questions concerning the underlying microbial interactions remain unanswered. In this study, a metagenomic approach was adopted to investigate the microbial composition and gene content contributing to enhanced biogas production from sludge subjected to a novel pretreatment method (maintaining pH at 10 for 8 days) compared to other documented methods (ultrasonic, thermal and thermal-alkaline).

Results

Our results showed that pretreated sludge attained a maximum methane yield approximately 4-fold higher than that of the blank un-pretreated sludge set-up at day 17. Both the microbial and metabolic consortium shifted extensively towards enhanced biodegradation subsequent to pretreatment, providing insight for the enhanced methane yield. The prevalence of Methanosaeta thermophila and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus, together with the functional affiliation of enzymes-encoding genes suggested an acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis pathway. Additionally, an alternative enzymology in Methanosaeta was observed.

Conclusions

This study is the first to provide a microbiological understanding of improved biogas production subsequent to a novel waste sludge pretreatment method. The knowledge garnered will assist the design of more efficient pretreatment methods for biogas production in the future.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Wong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kim S, Kim J, Park C, Kim TH, Lee M, Kim SW, Lee J: Effects of various pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion with waste activated sludge. J Biosci Bioeng 2003, 95:271-275.
• [2]Reynolds TDR, P A: Unit operations and process in environmental engineering. 2nd edition. Boston, MA, USA: PWS Publishing; 1996.
• [3]Jahng D, Cui R: Enhanced methane production from anaerobic digestion of disintegrated and deproteinized excess sludge. Biotechnol Lett 2006, 28:531-538.
• [4]Zhang D, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Zhu X: New sludge pretreatment method to improve methane production in waste activated sludge digestion. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:4802-4808.
• [5]Weemaes M, Grootaerd H, Simoens F, Verstraete W: Anaerobic digestion of ozonized biosolids. Water Res 2000, 34:2330-2336.
• [6]Shin SG, Lee S, Lee C, Hwang K, Hwang S: Qualitative and quantitative assessment of microbial community in batch anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge. Bioresource Technol 2010, 101:9461-9470.
• [7]Mossakowska A, Hellstrom BG, Hultman B: Strategies for sludge handling in the Stockholm region. Water Sci Technol 1998, 38:111-118.
• [8]Odegaard H, Paulsrud B, Karlsson I: Wastewater sludge as a resource: sludge disposal strategies and corresponding treatment technologies aimed at sustainable handling of wastewater sludge. Water Sci Technol 2002, 46:295-303.
• [9]Riviere D, Desvignes V, Pelletier E, Chaussonnerie S, Guermazi S, Weissenbach J, Li T, Camacho P, Sghir A: Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. ISME J 2009, 3:700-714.
• [10]Supaphol S, Jenkins SN, Intomo P, Waite IS, O’Donnell AG: Microbial community dynamics in mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of mixed waste. Bioresource Technol 2011, 102:4021-4027.
• [11]Ting CH, Lin KR, Lee DJ, Tay JH: Production of hydrogen and methane from wastewater sludge using anaerobic fermentation. Water Sci Technol 2004, 50:223-228.
• [12]Raskin L, Griffin ME, McMahon KD, Mackie RI: Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998, 57:342-355.
• [13]Stams AJ: Metabolic interactions between anaerobic bacteria in methanogenic environments. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1994, 66:271-294.
• [14]Schink B: Syntrophic associations in methanogenic degradation. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 2006, 41:1-19.
• [15]Thauer RK: Biochemistry of methanogenesis: a tribute to Marjory Stephenson. 1998 Marjory Stephenson Prize Lecture. Microbiology 1998, 144(Pt 9):2377-2406.
• [16]Li YY, Noike T: Upgrading of anaerobic-digestion of waste activated-sludge by thermal pretreatment. Water Sci Technol 1992, 26:857-866.
• [17]Vlyssides AG, Karlis PK: Thermal-alkaline solubilization of waste activated sludge as a pre-treatment stage for anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol 2004, 91:201-206.
• [18]Neis U, Tiehm A, Nickel K, Zellhorn M: Ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration for improving anaerobic stabilization. Water Res 2001, 35:2003-2009.
• [19]Tanaka S, Kobayashi T, Kamiyama K, Bildan MLNS: Effects of thermochemical pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 1997, 35:209-215.
• [20]Wei H, Tucker MP, Baker JO, Harris M, Luo Y, Xu Q, Himmel ME, Ding SY: Tracking dynamics of plant biomass composting by changes in substrate structure, microbial community, and enzyme activity. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012, 5:20. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Lau MW, Gunawan C, Dale BE: The impacts of pretreatment on the fermentability of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: a comparative evaluation between ammonia fiber expansion and dilute acid pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels 2009, 2:30. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Yuan HY, Chen YG, Zhang HX, Jiang S, Zhou Q, Gu GW: Improved bioproduction of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) from excess sludge under alkaline conditions. Environ Sci Technol 2006, 40:2025-2029.
• [23]He PJ, Yu GH, Shao LM, He PP: Toward understanding the mechanism of improving the production of volatile fatty acids from activated sludge at pH 10.0. Water Res 2008, 42:4637-4644.
• [24]Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, Halpern AL, Rusch D, Eisen JA, Wu DY, Paulsen I, Nelson KE, Nelson W: Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 2004, 304:66-74.
• [25]Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Mark Welch D, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ: Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:12115-12120.
• [26]Krober M, Bekel T, Diaz NN, Goesmann A, Jaenicke S, Krause L, Miller D, Runte KJ, Viehover P, Puhler A, Schluter A: Phylogenetic characterization of a biogas plant microbial community integrating clone library 16S-rDNA sequences and metagenome sequence data obtained by 454-pyrosequencing. J Biotechnol 2009, 142:38-49.
• [27]Hollister EB, Engledow AS, Hammett AJM, Provin TL, Wilkinson HH, Gentry TJ: Shifts in microbial community structure along an ecological gradient of hypersaline soils and sediments. ISME J 2010, 4:829-838.
• [28]Wirth R, Kovács E, Maróti G, Bagi Z, Rákhely G, Kovács KL: Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012, 5:4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Zhang H, Banaszak JE, Parameswaran P, Alder J, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Rittmann BE: Focused-Pulsed sludge pre-treatment increases the bacterial diversity and relative abundance of acetoclastic methanogens in a full-scale anaerobic digester. Water Res 2009, 43:4517-4526.
• [30]Dinsdale EA, Edwards RA, Hall D, Angly F, Breitbart M, Brulc JM, Furlan M, Desnues C, Haynes M, Li LL: Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes. Nature 2008, 452:629-U628.
• [31]Okabe S, Ariesyady HD, Ito T: Functional bacterial and archaeal community structures of major trophic groups in a full-scale anaerobic sludge digester. Water Res 2007, 41:1554-1568.
• [32]Tanner RS: Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms - Zehnder, Ajb. Science 1989, 245:201-202.
• [33]Deppenmeier U: The unique biochemistry of methanogenesis. Prog Nucleic Acid Re 2002, 71:223-283.
• [34]Blackall LL, Burrell PC, O’Sullivan C, Song H, Clarke WP: Identification, detection, and spatial resolution of Clostridium populations responsible for cellulose degradation in a methanogenic landfill leachate bioreactor. Appl Environ Microb 2004, 70:2414-2419.
• [35]Klocke M, Mahnert P, Mundt K, Souidi K, Linke B: Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. Syst Appl Microbiol 2007, 30:139-151.
• [36]Sekiguchi Y, Takahashi H, Kamagata Y, Ohashi A, Harada H: In situ detection, isolation, and physiological properties of a thin filamentous microorganism abundant in methanogenic granular sludges: a novel isolate affiliated with a clone cluster, the green non-sulfur bacteria, subdivision I. Appl Environ Microb 2001, 67:5740-5749.
• [37]Blackall LL, Bjornsson L, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW: Filamentous Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) are abundant in wastewater treatment processes with biological nutrient removal. Microbiol-Sgm 2002, 148:2309-2318.
• [38]Sekiguchi Y, Yamada T, Hanada S, Ohashi A, Harada H, Kamagata Y: Anaerolinea thermophila gen. nov., sp nov and Caldilinea aerophila gen. nov., sp nov., novel filamentous thermophiles that represent a previously uncultured lineage of the domain Bacteria at the subphylum level. Int J Syst Evol Micr 2003, 53:1843-1851.
• [39]Zakrzewski M, Goesmann A, Jaenicke S, Junemann S, Eikmeyer F, Szczepanowski R, Al-Soud WA, Sorensen S, Puhler A, Schluter A: Profiling of the metabolically active community from a production-scale biogas plant by means of high-throughput metatranscriptome sequencing. J Biotechnol 2012, 158:248-258.
• [40]Jaenicke S, Ander C, Bekel T, Bisdorf R, Droge M, Gartemann KH, Junemann S, Kaiser O, Krause L, Tille F: Comparative and joint analysis of two metagenomic datasets from a biogas fermenter obtained by 454-pyrosequencing. PLoS One 2011, 6:e14519.
• [41]Liu WT, Lykidis A, Chen CL, Tringe SG, McHardy AC, Copeland A, Kyrpides NC, Hugenholtz P, Macarie H, Olmos A, Monroy O: Multiple syntrophic interactions in a terephthalate-degrading methanogenic consortium. ISME J 2011, 5:122-130.
• [42]Nelson MC, Morrison M, Yu Z: A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:3730-3739.
• [43]Whitman WB, Liu YC: Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann Ny Acad Sci 2008, 1125:171-189.
• [44]Raskin L, McMahon KD, Zheng DD, Stams AJM, Mackie RI: Microbial population dynamics during start-up and overload conditions of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and sewage sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004, 87:823-834.
• [45]Raskin L, Stroot PG, McMahon KD, Mackie RI: Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions - I. Digester performance. Water Res 2001, 35:1804-1816.
• [46]Liesack W, Grosskopf R, Janssen PH: Diversity and structure of the methanogenic community in anoxic rice paddy soil microcosms as examined by cultivation and direct 16S rRNA gene sequence retrieval. Appl Environ Microb 1998, 64:960-969.
• [47]Shigematsu T, Tang Y, Kobayashi T, Kawaguchi H, Morimura S, Kida K: Effect of dilution rate on metabolic pathway shift between aceticlastic and nonaceticlastic methanogenesis in chemostat cultivation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004, 70:4048-4052.
• [48]Jetten MSM, Stams AJM, Zehnder AJB: Acetate threshold values and acetate activating enzymes in methanogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1990, 73:339-344.
• [49]Nettmann E, Bergmann I, Pramschufer S, Mundt K, Plogsties V, Herrmann C, Klocke M: Polyphasic analyses of methanogenic archaeal communities in agricultural biogas plants (vol 76, pg 2540, 2010). Appl Environ Microb 2011, 77:394-394.
• [50]Lee C, Kim J, Hwang K, O’Flaherty V, Hwang S: Quantitative analysis of methanogenic community dynamics in three anaerobic batch digesters treating different wastewaters. Water Res 2009, 43:157-165.
• [51]Smith KS, Ingram-Smith C: Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen? Trends Microbiol 2007, 15:150-155.
• [52]Smith DR, DoucetteStamm LA, Deloughery C, Lee HM, Dubois J, Aldredge T, Bashirzadeh R, Blakely D, Cook R, Gilbert K: Complete genome sequence of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum Delta H: Functional analysis and comparative genomics. J Bacteriol 1997, 179:7135-7155.
• [53]Boone DW WB, Rouviere P: Diversity and taxonomy of methanogens. In Methanogenesis ecology, physiology, biochemistry & genetics. Edited by JG F. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1993:35-80.
• [54]Kanehisa M, Goto S: KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:27-30.
• [55]Karp PD, Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Kaipa P, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Paley S, Rhee SY, Shearer AG: The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D623-D631.
• [56]Krause L, Diaz NN, Edwards RA, Gartemann KH, Kromeke H, Neuweger H, Puhler A, Runte KJ, Schluter A, Stoye J: Taxonomic composition and gene content of a methane-producing microbial community isolated from a biogas reactor. J Biotechnol 2008, 136:91-101.
• [57]Metcalf WW, Rother M: Anaerobic growth of Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A on carbon monoxide: An unusual way of life for a methanogenic archaeon. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:16929-16934.
• [58]Singhwissmann K, Ferry JG: Transcriptional regulation of the phosphotransacetylase-encoding and acetate kinase-encoding genes (Pta and Ack) from methanosarcina-thermophila. J Bacteriol 1995, 177:1699-1702.
• [59]Frolund B, Griebe T, Nielsen PH: Enzymatic-activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix. Appl Microbiol Biot 1995, 43:755-761.
• [60]Gessesse A, Dueholm T, Petersen SB, Nielsen PH: Lipase and protease extraction from activated sludge. Water Res 2003, 37:3652-3657.
• [61]Pletschke BI, Burgess JE: Hydrolytic enzymes in sewage sludge treatment: A mini-review. Water Sa 2008, 34:343-349.
• [62]Carrere H, Dumas C, Battimelli A, Batstone DJ, Delgenes JP, Steyer JP, Ferrer I: Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. J Hazard Mater 2010, 183:1-15.
• [63]Cescutti P, Toffanin R, Pollesello P, Sutherland IW: Structural determination of the acidic exopolysaccharide produced by a Pseudomonas sp. strain 1.15. Carbohydr Res 1999, 315:159-168.
• [64]Sutherland IW, Kennedy L: Polysaccharide lyases from gellan-producing Sphingomonas spp. Microbiology 1996, 142(Pt 4):867-872.
• [65]Li LL, McCorkle SR, Monchy S, Taghavi S, van der Lelie D: Bioprospecting metagenomes: glycosyl hydrolases for converting biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 2009, 2:10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [66]Rubin EM, Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, Kim TW, Chokhawala H, Schroth G, Luo SJ, Clark DS, Chen F: Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from Cow rumen. Science 2011, 331:463-467.
• [67]Suen G, Scott JJ, Aylward FO, Adams SM, Tringe SG, Pinto-Tomas AA, Foster CE, Pauly M, Weimer PJ, Barry KW: An insect herbivore microbiome with high plant biomass-degrading capacity. PLoS Genet 2010, 6(9):e1001129.
• [68]Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B: The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D233-238.
• [69]Zhu W, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M: Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:e132.
• [70]Li LL, Taghavi S, McCorkle SM, Zhang YB, Blewitt MG, Brunecky R, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Brumm P, Drinkwater C: Bioprospecting metagenomics of decaying wood: mining for new glycoside hydrolases. Biotechnol Biofuels 2011, 4:23. BioMed Central Full Text
• [71]Chu LB, Wang JL, Wang B, Xing XH, Yan ST, Sun XL, Jurcik B: Changes in biomass activity and characteristics of activated sludge exposed to low ozone dose. Chemosphere 2009, 77:269-272.
• [72]Wei YS, Van Houten RT, Borger AR, Eikelboom DH, Fan YB: Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 2003, 37:4453-4467.
• [73]Bassin JP, Pronk M, Muyzer G, Kleerebezem R, Dezotti M, van Loosdrecht MCM: Effect of elevated salt concentrations on the aerobic granular sludge process: linking microbial activity with microbial community structure. Appl Environ Microb 2011, 77:7942-7953.
• [74]del Rio AV, Morales N, Isanta E, Mosquera-Corral A, Campos JL, Steyer JP, Carrere H: Thermal pre-treatment of aerobic granular sludge: Impact on anaerobic biodegradability. Water Res 2011, 45:6011-6020.
• [75]Eaton AD, Franson MAH, Association APH: Association AWW. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater. Federation WE: American Public Health Association; 1998.
• [76]Meyer F, Paarmann D, D’Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, Paczian T, Rodriguez A, Stevens R, Wilke A: The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinforma 2008, 9:386. BioMed Central Full Text
• [77]Huson DH, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh HJ, Weber N, Schuster SC: Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res 2011, 21:1552-1560.
• [78]Eddy SR: Profile hidden markov models. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:755-763.