期刊论文详细信息
Behavioral and Brain Functions
Difficulty in disengaging from threat and temperamental negative affectivity in early life: A longitudinal study of infants aged 12–36 months
Atsuko Nakagawa1  Masune Sukigara1 
[1] Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagoya City University, 1, Yamanohata, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8501, Japan
关键词: Temperament;    Longitudinal study;    Negative affect;    Infant;    Attention;   
Others  :  1106730
DOI  :  10.1186/1744-9081-8-40
 received in 2012-02-15, accepted in 2012-08-09,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Attention disengagement is reportedly influenced by perceiving a fearful facial expression even in the first year of life. In the present study, we examined whether individual differences in disengaging from fearful expressions predict temperamental negative affectivity.

Method

Twenty-six infants were studied longitudinally at 12, 18, 24, and 36 months, using an overlap paradigm and two temperament questionnaires: the Japanese versions of the revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire and Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire.

Results

The infants fixated significantly more frequently to fearful than to happy or neutral faces. The attentional bias to threat (i.e., the number of fixed responses on fearful faces divided by the total number of fixed responses on faces) at 12 months was significantly positively correlated with negative affect at 12 months, and its relations with negative affect measured later in development was in the expected positive direction at each age. In addition, a moderation analysis indicates that the orienting network and not the executive network marginally moderated the relation between early attentional bias and later fear.

Conclusions

The results suggest that at 12 months, infants with more negative affectivity exhibit greater difficulty in disengaging their attention from fearful faces. We also found evidence that the association between parent-reported fear and disengagement might be modulated in the second year, perhaps because of the differences in temperamental control networks.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Nakagawa and Sukigara; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150202011602339.pdf 217KB PDF download
Figure 1. 24KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Fox E, Russo R, Bowles RJ, Dutton K: Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in sub-clinical anxiety? J Exp Psychol Gen 2001, 130:681-700.
  • [2]Georgiou GA, Bleakley C, Hayward J, Russo R, Dutton K, Eltiti S, Fox E: Focusing on fear: attentional disengagement from emotional faces. Vis Cogn 2005, 12:145-158.
  • [3]Derryberry D, Reed MA: Regulatory processes and the development of cognitive representations. Dev Psychopathol 1996, 8:215-234.
  • [4]LoBue V, Deloache JS: Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy. Deve Sci 2010, 13:221-228.
  • [5]Peltola MJ, Leppänen JM, Palokangas T, Hietanen JK: Fearful faces modulate looking duration and attention disengagement in 7-month-old infants. Dev Sci 2008, 11:60-68.
  • [6]Peltola MJ, Leppänen JM, Vogel-Farley VK, Hietanen JK, Nelson CA: Fearful faces but not fearful eyes alone delay attention disengagement in 7-month-old infants. Emotion 2009, 9:560-565.
  • [7]Leppänen JM, Peltola MJ, Mäntymaa M, Koivuluoma M, Salminen A, Puura K: Cardiac and behavioral evidence for emotional influences on attention in 7-month-old infants. Int J Behav Dev 2010, 34:547-553.
  • [8]Hazen RA, Vasey MW, Schmidt NB: Attentional retraining: a randomized clinical trial for pathological worry. J Psychiat Res 2009, 43:627-633.
  • [9]MacLeod C, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L: Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol 2002, 111:107-123.
  • [10]Lonigan CJ, Vasey MW, Phillips BM, Hazen RA: Temperament, anxiety, and the processing of threat-relevant stimuli. J Clin Child Adolescent Psychol 2004, 33:8-20.
  • [11]Fox NA, Hane AA, Pine DS: Plasticity for affective neurocircuitry. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2007, 16:1-5.
  • [12]Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH: Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:1-24.
  • [13]Kiel EJ, Buss KA: Toddlers’ duration of attention toward putative threat. Infancy 2011, 16:198-210.
  • [14]Pérez-Edgar K, Reeb-Sutherland BC, McDermott JM, White LK, Henderson HA, Degnan KA, Hane AA, Pine DS, Fox NA: Attention biases to threat link behavioral inhibition to social withdrawal over time in very young children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2011, 39:885-895.
  • [15]Rothbart MK: Temperament and the development of inhibited approach. Child Dev 1988, 59:1241-1250.
  • [16]Nakagawa A, Sukigara M: How are cultural differences in the interpretation of infant behavior reflected in the Japanese revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire? Jpn J Educ Psychol 2005, 53:491-503.
  • [17]Sukigara M, Nakagawa A, Mizuno R: Studying toddler temperament via Japanese Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire [abstract]. Jnp Psychol Ass 2007, 71:1095.
  • [18]Posner MI, Rothbart MK: Educating the human brain. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC; 2007.
  • [19]Lonigan CJ, Vasey MW: Negative affectivity, effortful control, and attention to threat-relevant stimuli. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2009, 37:387-399.
  • [20]Posner MI, Rothbart MK, Sheese BE, Voelker P: Control networks and neuromodulators of early development. Dev Psychol 2012, 48:827-835.
  • [21]Matsumoto D, Ekman P: Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE) and Neutral Faces (JACNeuF). University of California, Human Interaction Laboratory, San Francisco, CA; 1988.
  • [22]Putnam SP, Ellis LK, Rothbart MK: The structure of temperament from infancy through adolescence. In Advances in research on temperament. Edited by Eliasz A, Angleitner A. Pabst Scientist Publisher, Germany; 2001:165-182.
  • [23]Rothbart MK, Sheese BE, Rueda MR, Posner MI: Developing mechanisms of self-regulation in early life. Emot Rev 2011, 3:1-7.
  • [24]Gelskov SV, Kouider S: Psychophysical thresholds of face visibility during infancy. Cognition 2010, 114:285-292.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:36次 浏览次数:43次