期刊论文详细信息
Behavioral and Brain Functions
Effects of environmental and physiological covariates on sex differences in unconditioned and conditioned anxiety and fear in a large sample of genetically heterogeneous (N/Nih-HS) rats
Regina López-Aumatell2  Esther Martínez-Membrives1  Elia Vicens-Costa1  Toni Cañete1  Gloria Blázquez1  Carme Mont-Cardona1  Martina Johannesson2  Jonathan Flint2  Adolf Tobeña1  Alberto Fernández-Teruel1 
[1] Medical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Institut de Neurociències, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive Oxford, UK
关键词: physiological covariates;    environmental covariates;    large samples;    genetically heterogeneous rats;    fear;    Anxiety;   
Others  :  797572
DOI  :  10.1186/1744-9081-7-48
 received in 2011-04-06, accepted in 2011-11-25,  发布年份 2011
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Physiological and environmental variables, or covariates, can account for an important portion of the variability observed in behavioural/physiological results from different laboratories even when using the same type of animals and phenotyping procedures. We present the results of a behavioural study with a sample of 1456 genetically heterogeneous N/Nih-HS rats, including males and females, which are part of a larger genome-wide fine-mapping QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) study. N/Nih-HS rats have been derived from 8 inbred strains and provide very small distance between genetic recombinations, which makes them a unique tool for fine-mapping QTL studies. The behavioural test battery comprised the elevated zero-maze test for anxiety, novel-cage (open-field like) activity, two-way active avoidance acquisition (related to conditioned anxiety) and context-conditioned freezing (i.e. classically conditioned fear). Using factorial analyses of variance (ANOVAs) we aimed to analyse sex differences in anxiety and fear in this N/Nih-HS rat sample, as well as to assess the effects of (and interactions with) other independent factors, such as batch, season, coat colour and experimenter. Body weight was taken as a quantitative covariate and analysed by covariance analysis (ANCOVA). Obliquely-rotated factor analyses were also performed separately for each sex, in order to evaluate associations among the most relevant variables from each behavioural test and the common dimensions (i.e. factors) underlying the different behavioural responses. ANOVA analyses showed a consistent pattern of sex effects, with females showing less signs of anxiety and fear than males across all tests. There were also significant main effects of batch, season, colour and experimenter on almost all behavioural variables, as well as "sex × batch", "sex × season" and "sex × experimenter" interactions. Body weight showed significant effects in the ANCOVAs of most behavioural measures, but sex effects were still present in spite of (and after controlling for) these "body weight" effects. Factor analyses of relevant variables from each test showed a two-fold factor structure in both sexes, with the first factor mainly representing anxiety and conditioned fear in males, while in females the first factor was dominated by loadings of activity measures. Thus, besides showing consistent sex differences in anxiety-, fear- and activity-related responses in N/Nih-HS rats, the present study shows that females' behaviour is predominantly influenced by activity while males are more influenced by anxiety. Moreover, the results point out that, besides "sex" effects, physiological variables such as colour and body weight, and environmental factors as batch/season or "experimenter", have to be taken into account in both behavioural and quantitative genetic studies because of their demonstrated influences on phenotypic outcomes.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 López-Aumatell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140706065145958.pdf 613KB PDF download
Figure 7. 49KB Image download
Figure 6. 62KB Image download
Figure 5. 62KB Image download
Figure 4. 101KB Image download
Figure 3. 84KB Image download
Figure 2. 82KB Image download
Figure 1. 141KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC: Genetics of mouse behaviour: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 1999, 284(5420):1670-1672.
  • [2]Chesler EJ, Wilson SG, Lariviere WR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Mogil JS: Influences of laboratory environment on behaviour. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5(11):1101-1102.
  • [3]Mandillo S, Tucci V, Hölter SM, Meziane H, Banchaabouchi MA, Kallnik M, Lad HV, Nolan PM, Ouagazzal AM, Coghill EL, Gale K, Golini E, Jacquot S, Krezel W, Parker A, Riet F, Schneider I, Marazziti D, Auwerx J, Brown SD, Chambon P, Rosenthal N, Tocchini-Valentini G, Wurst W: Reliability, robustness, and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory study. Physiol Genomics 2008, 34(3):243-255.
  • [4]Milad MR, Igoe SA, Lebron-Milad K, Novales JE: Estrous cycle phase and gonadal hormones influence conditioned fear extinction. Neuroscience 2009, 164(3):887-895.
  • [5]Tucci V, Lad HV, Parker A, Polley S, Brown SD, Nolan PM: Gene-environment interactions differentially affect mouse strain behavioral parameters. Mamm Genome 2006, 17(11):1113-1120.
  • [6]Valdar W, Solberg LC, Gauguier D, Cookson WO, Rawlins JNP, Mott R, Flint J: Genetic and environmental effects on complex traits in mice. Genetics 2006, 174:959-984.
  • [7]Valdar W, Solberg LC, Gauguier D, Burnett S, Klenerman P, Cookson WO, Taylor MS, Rawlins JN, Mott R, Flint J: Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice. Nat Genet 2006, 38(8):879-887.
  • [8]Plomin R: The role of inheritance in behaviour. Science 1990, 248:183-188.
  • [9]Thomas D: Methods for investigating gene-environment interactions in candidate pathway and genome-wide association studies. Annu Rev Public Health 2010, 31:21-36.
  • [10]Solberg LC, Valdar W, Gauguier D, Nunez G, Taylor A, Burnett S, Arboledas-Hita C, Hernandez-Pliego P, Davidson S, Burns P, Bhattacharya S, Hough T, Higgs D, Klenerman P, Cookson WO, Zhang Y, Deacon RM, Rawlins JN, Mott R, Flint J: A protocol for high-throughput phenotyping, suitable for quantitative trait analysis in mice. Mamm Genome 2006, 17(2):129-146.
  • [11]Mott R, Flint J: Simultaneous detection and fine mapping of quantitative trait loci in mice using heterogeneous stocks. Genetics 2002, 160(4):1609-1618.
  • [12]Johannesson M, Lopez-Aumatell R, Stridh P, Diez M, Tuncel J, Blázquez G, Martinez-Membrives E, Cañete T, Vicens-Costa E, Graham D, Copley RR, Hernandez-Pliego P, Beyeen AD, Ockinger J, Fernández-Santamaría C, Gulko PS, Brenner M, Tobeña A, Guitart-Masip M, Giménez-Llort L, Dominiczak A, Holmdahl R, Gauguier D, Olsson T, Mott R, Valdar W, Redei EE, Fernández-Teruel A, Flint J: A resource for the simultaneous high-resolution mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci in rats: the NIH heterogeneous stock. Genome Res 2008, 19(1):150-158.
  • [13]Aitman TJ, Critser JK, Cuppen E, Dominiczak A, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Flint J, Gauguier D, Geurts AM, Gould M, Harris PC, Holmdahl R, Hubner N, Izsvák Z, Jacob HJ, Kuramoto T, Kwitek AE, Marrone A, Mashimo T, Moreno C, Mullins J, Mullins L, Olsson T, Pravenec M, Riley L, Saar K, Serikawa T, Shull JD, Szpirer C, Twigger SN, Voigt B, Worley K: Progress and prospects in rat genetics: a community view. Nat Genet 2008, 40(5):516-522.
  • [14]Hansen C, Spuhler K: Development of the National Institutes of Health genetically heterogeneous rat stock. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1984, 8(5):477-479.
  • [15]Aguilar R, Gil L, Flint J, Gray JA, Dawson GR, Driscoll P, Giménez-Llort L, Escorihuela RM, Fernández-Teruel A, Tobeña A: Learned fear, emotional reactivity and fear of heights: a factor analytic map from a large F(2) intercross of Roman rat strains. Brain Res Bull 2002, 57(1):17-26.
  • [16]Fernández-Teruel A, Escorihuela RM, Núñez JF, Zapata A, Boix F, Salazar W, Tobeña A: The early acquisition of two-way (shuttle-box) avoidance as an anxiety-mediated behaviour: psychopharmacological validation. Brain Res Bull 1991, 26(1):173-176.
  • [17]Fernández-Teruel A, Escorihuela RM, Gray JA, Aguilar R, Gil L, Giménez-Llort L, Tobeña A, Bhomra A, Nicod A, Mott R, Driscoll P, Dawson GR, Flint J: A quantitative trait locus influencing anxiety in the laboratory rat. Genome Res 2002, 12(4):618-626.
  • [18]Gray JA, McNaughton N: The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  • [19]Lopez-Aumatell R, Guitart-Masip M, Vicens-Costa E, Gimenez-Llort L, Valdar W, Johannesson M, Flint J, Tobeña A, Fernández-Teruel A: Fearfulness in a large N/Nih genetically heterogeneous rat stock: differential profiles of timidity and defensive flight in males and females. Behav Brain Res 2008, 188(1):41-55.
  • [20]Shepherd JK, Grewal SS, Fletcher A, Bill DJ, Dourish CT: Behavioural and pharmacological characterisation of the elevated "zero-maze" as an animal model of anxiety. Psychopharmacology 1994, 116:56-64.
  • [21]Pähkla R, Kask A, Rägo L: Differential effects of beta-carbolines and antidepressants on rat exploratory activity in the elevated zero-maze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000, 65(4):737-742.
  • [22]Aguilar R, Gil L, Gray JA, Driscoll P, Flint J, Dawson GR, Giménez-Llort L, Escorihuela RM, Fernández-Teruel A, Tobeña A: Fearfulness and sex in F2 Roman rats: males display more fear though both sexes share the same fearfulness traits. Physiol Behav 2003, 78(4-5):723-732.
  • [23]Lopez-Aumatell R, Vicens-Costa E, Guitart-Masip M, Martínez-Membrives E, Valdar W, Johannesson M, Cañete T, Blázquez G, Driscoll P, Flint J, Tobeña A, Fernández-Teruel A: Unlearned anxiety predicts learned fear: a comparison among heterogeneous rats and the Roman rat strains. Behav Brain Res 2009, 202(1):92-101.
  • [24]Vicens-Costa E, Martínez-Membrives E, López-Aumatell R, Guitart-Masip M, Cañete T, Blázquez G, Tobeña A, Fernández-Teruel A: Two-way avoidance acquisition is negatively related to conditioned freezing and positively associated with startle reactions: A dissection of anxiety and fear in genetically heterogeneous rats. Physiol Behav 2011, 103(2):148-156.
  • [25]Davis M, Whalen PJ: The amygdala: vigilance and emotion. Mol Psychiatry 2001, 6(1):13-34.
  • [26]LeDoux: Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000, 23:155-184.
  • [27]Fernandes C, González MI, Wilson CA, File SE: Factor analysis shows that female rat behavior is characterised primarily by activity, male rats are driven by sex and anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1999, 64:731-738.
  • [28]Van der Staay FJ: Shift in the performance of 24-month-old Wistar rats in the Morris water escape task: a comparison across 36 experiments. Behav Brain Res 1997, 87(2):213-222.
  • [29]Cabib S, Orsini C, Le Moal M, Piazza PV: Abolition and reversal of strain differences in behavioural responses to drugs of abuse after a brief experience. Science 2000, 289(5478):463-465.
  • [30]Munafò MR, Flint J: Replication and heterogeneity in gene X environment interaction studies. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2009, 12(6):727-729.
  • [31]Flint J, Valdar W, Shifman S, Mott R: Strategies for mapping and cloning quantitative trait genes in rodents. Nat Rev Genet 2005, 6(4):271-286.
  • [32]Flint J, Mackay TFC: Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans. Genome Res 2010, 19:723-733.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:92次 浏览次数:14次