Influence of life history strategies on sensitivity, population growth and response to climate for sympatric alpine birds

Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Scott Wilson¹  Kathy Martin² 

[1] Present address: Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, 115 Perimeter Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0X4, Canada

[2] Environment Canada, 5421 Robertson Road, Delta, British Columbia, V4K 3 N2, Canada

关键词: Survival;    Reproductive effort;    Ptarmigan;    Population growth;    Life history variation;    Elasticity;    Climate change;    Alpine;   

Others  :  1085995
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6785-12-9

 received in 2012-02-14, accepted in 2012-06-25,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

The life history strategy of a species can influence how populations of that species respond to environmental variation. In this study, we used a matrix modeling approach to examine how life history differences among sympatric rock and white-tailed ptarmigan affect the influence of demographic rates on population growth (λ) and the potential response to a changing climate. Rock ptarmigan have a slower life history strategy than white-tailed ptarmigan in the study region with lower annual reproductive effort but higher adult survival.

Results

Based on data from a 5-year field study, deterministic estimates of λ indicated that populations were stable for rock ptarmigan (λ = 1.01), but declining for white-tailed ptarmigan (λ = 0.96). The demographic rates with the highest elasticity for rock ptarmigan were the survival of after-second year females, followed by juvenile survival and success of the first nest. For white-tailed ptarmigan, juvenile survival had the highest elasticity followed by success of the first nest and survival of second-year females. Incorporating stochasticity into the demographic rates led to a 2 and 4% drop in λ for rock and white-tailed ptarmigan respectively. Using data from the first three years we also found that population growth rates of both species were depressed following an increased frequency of severe years, but less so for rock ptarmigan which showed greater resilience under these conditions.

Conclusions

Our results provide evidence that populations of closely related species can vary in their response to environmental change as a consequence of life history differences. Rock ptarmigan, with a slower life history, are more responsive to demographic rates that influence survival and older life stages but this response is tempered by the extent of variability in each of the rates. Thus, predictions need to consider both aspects in modeling population response to a varying climate. Juvenile survival was a highly influential rate for both species, but the period from independence to first breeding is a poorly understood stage for many bird species. Additional study on juvenile survival, the influence of density dependence and the effects of predators as the mechanism driving survival-reproduction tradeoffs are all areas requiring further study.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Wilson and Martin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kwon WT, Laprise R, Rueda VM, Mearns L, Menéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P: Regional Climate Projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Avery KB. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA; 2007.
• [2]Sæther BE, Bakke Ø: Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 2000, 81:642-653.
• [3]Oli MK, Dobson FS: The relative importance of life-history variables to population growth in mammals: Cole’s prediction revisited. Am Nat 2003, 161:422-440.
• [4]Stahl JT, Oli MK: Relative importance of avian life-history variables to population growth rate. Ecol Model 2006, 198:23-39.
• [5]Clark ME, Martin TE: Modeling tradeoffs in avian life history traits and consequences for population growth. Ecol Model 2007, 209:110-120.
• [6]Caswell H: Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts; 2001.
• [7]Beissinger SR, Walters JR, Catanzaro DG, Smith KG, Dunning JB, Haig SM, Noon BR, Stith BM: Modeling approaches in avian conservation and the role of field biologists. Ornith Monogr 2006, 59:1-56.
• [8]Reed AW, Kaufman GA, Sandercock BK: Demographic response of a grassland rodent to environmental variability. J Mammal 2007, 88:982-988.
• [9]Lande R: Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am Nat 1993, 142:911-927.
• [10]Morris WF, Doak DF: Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts; 2002.
• [11]Saltz D, Rubenstein DI, White GC: The impact of increased environmental stochasticity due to climate change on the dynamics of Asiatic Wild Ass. Conserv Biol 2006, 20:1402-1409.
• [12]Hilderbrand RH, Gardner RH, Ratnaswamy MJ, Keller CE: Evaluating population persistence of Delmarva fox squirrels and potential impacts of climate change. Biol Conserv 2007, 137:70-77.
• [13]Wilson S, Martin K: Variable reproductive effort for two sympatric ptarmigan in response to spring weather conditions in a northern alpine ecosystem. J Avian Biol 2010, 41:319-326.
• [14]Plummer DA, Caya D, Frigon A, Côte H, Giguère M, Paquin D, Biner S, Harvey R, de Elia R: Climate and Climate Change over North America as Simulated by the Canadian RCM. J Climatol 2006, 19:3112-3132.
• [15]Wilson S: Influence of environmental variation on habitat selection, life-history strategies and population dynamics of sympatric ptarmigan in the southern Yukon Territory. PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia; 2008.
• [16]Sandercock BK, Martin K, Hannon SJ: Life history strategies in extreme environments: comparative demography of arctic and alpine ptarmigan. Ecology 2005, 86:2176-2186.
• [17]Heppell SS, Caswell H, Crowder LB: Life histories and elasticity patterns: perturbation analysis for species with minimal demographic data. Ecology 2000, 81:654-665.
• [18]Beissinger SR, Westphal MI: On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. J Wildl Manage 1998, 62:821-841.
• [19]Camfield AF, Pearson SF, Martin K: A demographic model to evaluate population declines in the endangered Streaked Horned Lark. Avian Cons Ecol 2011, 6(2):4.
• [20]Wilson S, Martin K: Life history and demographic variation in an alpine specialist at the latitudinal extremes of the range. Popul Ecol 2011, 53:459-471.
• [21]Folk TH, Holmes RR, Grand JB: Variation in Northern Bobwhite demography along two temporal scales. Popul Ecol 2007, 49:211-219.
• [22]Frederiksen M, Harris MP, Wanless S: Inter-population variation in demographic parameters: a neglected subject? Oikos 2005, 111:209-214.
• [23]Novoa C, Desmet JF, Brenot JF, Muffat-Joly B, Arvin-Bérod M, Resseguier J, Tran B: Demographic traits of two alpine populations of Rock Ptarmigan. In Ecology, conservation and management of grouse. Edited by Sandercock BK, Martin K, Segelbacher G. University of California Press, Berkeley, California; 2011:267-280. [Sandercock BK (Series Editor): Studies in Avian Biology, vol 39.]
• [24]Steen H, Erikstad KE: Sensitivity of willow grouse Lagopus lagopus population dynamics to variation in demographic parameters. Wildlife Biol 1996, 2:27-35.
• [25]Ludwig GX, Alatalo RV, Helle P, Linden H, Lindstrom J, Siitari H: Short and long-term population dynamical consequences of asymmetric climate change in black grouse. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 2006, 270:1461-1466.
• [26]Martin K, Hannon SJ: Natal philopatry and recruitment of Willow Ptarmigan in northcentral and northwestern Canada. Oecologia 1987, 71:518-524.
• [27]Martin K, Stacey PB, Braun CE: Recruitment, dispersal and demographic rescue in spatially-structured White-tailed ptarmigan populations. Condor 2000, 102:503-516.
• [28]Watson A, Moss R, Rae S: Population dynamics of Scottish rock ptarmigan cycles. Ecology 1998, 79:1174-1192.
• [29]Watson A, Moss R, Rothery P: Weather and synchrony in 10-year population cycles of rock ptarmigan and red grouse in Scotland. Ecology 2000, 81:2126-2136.
• [30]Moynahan BJ, Lindberg MS, Thomas JW: Factors contributing to process variance in annual survival of female greater sage grouse in Montana. Ecol Appl 2006, 16:1529-1538.
• [31]Wang G, Hobbs NT, Giesen KM, Galbraith H, Ojima DS, Braun CE: Relationships between climate and population dynamics of White-tailed ptarmigan Lagopus leucurus in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA. Climate Res 2002, 23:81-87.
• [32]Nielsen OK: Gyrfalcon predation on ptarmigan: numerical and functional responses. J Anim Ecol 1999, 68:1034-1050.
• [33]Valkama J, Korpimäki E, Arroyo B, Beja P, Bretagnolle V, Bro E, Kenward R, Mañosa S, Redpath SM, Thirgood S, Viñuela J: Birds of prey as limiting factors of gamebird populations in Europe: a review. Biol Rev 2005, 80:171-203.
• [34]Wilson S, Martin K: Breeding habitat selection of sympatric White-tailed, Rock, and Willow ptarmigan in the southern Yukon Territory, Canada. J Ornith 2008, 149:629-637.
• [35]Weeden RB, Watson A: Determining the age of rock ptarmigan in Alaska and Scotland. J Wildl Manage 1967, 31:825-826.
• [36]Westerkov K: Methods for determining the age of game bird eggs. J Wildl Manage 1950, 14:56-67.
• [37]Braun CE, Martin K, Robb LA: White-tailed ptarmigan (Lagopus leucura). In The Birds of North America Online. 68th edition. Edited by Poole A, Gill F. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York; 1993. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/068 webcite
• [38]Holder K, Montgomerie R: Rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta). In The Birds of North America Online. 51st edition. Edited by Poole A, Gill F. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York; 2008. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/051 webcite
• [39]Weeden RB: Breeding density, reproductive success and mortality of Rock ptarmigan at Eagle Creek, central Alaska from 1960–1964. T N Am Wildl Nat Res 1965, 30:336-348.
• [40]Steen JB, Unander S: Breeding biology of the Svalbard Rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus hyperboreus. Ornis Scand 1985, 16:191-197.
• [41]Sandercock BK, Martin K, Hannon SJ: Demographic consequences of age-structure in extreme environments: population models for arctic and alpine ptarmigan. Oecologia 2005, 146:13-24.
• [42]Martin K, Wilson S, Hannon SJ: Mechanisms underlying variation in renesting ability in Willow Ptarmigan. In Ecology, conservation and management of grouse. Edited by Sandercock BK, Martin K, Segelbacher G. University of California Press, Berkeley, California; 2011:233-246. [Sandercock BK (Series Editor): Studies in Avian Biology, vol 39.]
• [43]White GC, Burnham KP: Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 1999, 46(suppl):120-139.
• [44]Hannon SJ, Martin K: Ecology of juvenile grouse during the transition to adulthood. J Zool 2006, 269:422-433.
• [45]Mathworks: Matlab Version 7.1. Mathworks Inc, Natick, Massachusetts; 2005.
• [46]Boyce MS, Haridas CV, Lee CT, NCEAS Stochastic Demography Working Group: Demography in an increasingly variable world. Trends Ecol Evol 2006, 21:141-148.
• [47]Kendall BE: Estimating the magnitude of environmental stochasticity in survivorship data. Ecol Appl 1998, 8:184-193.
• [48]Ezard THG, Becker PH, Coulson T: The contributions of age and sex to variation in common tern population growth rate. J Anim Ecol 2006, 75:1379-1386.
• [49]Royama T: Analytical population dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London; 1992.