期刊论文详细信息
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Increases in the completeness of disease records in dairy databases following changes in the criteria determining whether a record counts as correct
Ann-Kristina Lind3  Hans Houe3  Mari N Espetvedt5  Cecilia Wolff2  Simo Rintakoski4  Peter T Thomsen1 
[1] Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, Tjele, DK-8830, Denmark
[2] Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7054, Uppsala, SE-750 07, Sweden
[3] Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 8, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Department of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland
[5] Department of Production Animal Clinical Science, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, P.O. Box 8146 Dep, Oslo, NO-0033, Norway
关键词: Locomotor disorders;    Farmer disease recording;    Completeness;    Validation;    Nordic dairy disease databases;   
Others  :  789429
DOI  :  10.1186/1751-0147-54-71
 received in 2012-07-03, accepted in 2012-11-27,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The four Nordic countries: Denmark (DK), Finland (FIN), Norway (NO) and Sweden (SE), all have national databases in which mainly records of treated animals are maintained. Recently, the completeness of locomotor disorder records in these databases has been evaluated using farmers’ recordings as a reference level. The objective of the present study was to see how previous estimates of completeness figures are affected by the criteria determining whether a recording in the database is to be judged correct. These demands included date of diagnosis and disease classification. In contrast with the previous study, a period of time between the date of disease recording in the database and by the farmer was allowed. Further, the calculations were brought to bear on individual locomotor diagnoses instead of a common locomotor disease complex code.

Methods

Randomly selected dairy herds (≥ 15 cows) were invited to participate. During two 2-month periods in 2008 the farmers recorded the diseases they observed on the farm and their recordings constituted a farmer database (FD). These recordings were compared to disease recordings in the National Databases (ND). Earlier calculations of completeness for locomotor complex cases assuming an exact match on date were compared with ±7 day and ±30 day discrepancies calculated in this study.

Results

The farmers in DK, FIN, NO and SE recorded 426, 147, 97 and 193 locomotor disorders, respectively. When a window of ±7 days was allowed there was a relative increase in completeness figures lying in the range of 24–100%. Further increases were minor, or non-existent, when the window was expanded to ±30 days. The same trend was seen for individual diagnoses.

Conclusion

In all four of the Nordic countries a common pattern can be observed: a further increase in completeness occurs when individual locomotor diagnoses recorded by the farmer are permitted to match any locomotor diagnosis recorded in the ND. Completeness increased when both time span and different diagnoses within the locomotor complex were allowed.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Lind et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140704180111241.pdf 187KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Thomsen P, Sørensen JT: Factors affecting the risk of euthanasia for cows in Danish dairy herds. Vet Rec 2009, 165:43-45.
  • [2]Nyman AK, Ekman T, Emanuelson U, Gustafsson AH, Holtenius K, Persson Waller K, Sandgren CH: Risk factors associated with the incidence of veterinary-treated clinical mastitis in Swedish dairy herds with a high milk yield and a low prevalence of subclinical mastitis. Prev Vet Med 2007, 78(2):142-160.
  • [3]Gulliksen SM, Lie KI, Løken T, Østerås O: Calf mortality in Norwegian dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92(6):2782-2795.
  • [4]Mörk MJ, Wolff C, Lindberg A, Vagsholm I, Egenvall A: Validation of a national disease recording system for dairy cattle against veterinary practice records. Prev Vet Med 2010, 93(2–3):183-192.
  • [5]Rintakoski S, Taponen J, Peltoniemi OAT, Virtala A-M: Validation of the Finnish national dairy disease register-Data transfer from cow health cards to the disease register. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:4309-4318.
  • [6]Espetvedt MN, Wolff C, Rintakoski S, Lind A, Østerås O: Completeness of metabolic disease recordings in Nordic National Databases for dairy cows. Prev Vet Med 2012, 105(1–2):25-37.
  • [7]Lind A, Thomsen PT, Ersbøll AE, Espetvedt MN, Wolff C, Rintakoski S, Houe H: Validation of Nordic dairy cattle disease recording databases – completeness for locomotor disorders. Prev Vet Med 2012, 107:204-213.
  • [8]Flower FC, Weary DM: Effect of Hoof Pathologies on Subjective Assessments of Dairy Cow Gait. J Dairy Sci 2006, 89(1):139-146.
  • [9]Gröhn Y, Saloniemi H, Syväjärvi J: An epidemiological and genetic study on registered diseases in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. I. The data, disease occurrence and culling. Acta Vet Scand 1986, 27(2):182-195.
  • [10]Olsson SO, Baekbo P, Hansson SÖ, Rautala H, Østerås O: Disease recording systems and herd health schemes for production diseases. Acta Vet Scand 2001, (Suppl 1):S51-S60.
  • [11]Bartlett PC, Agger JF, Houe H, Lawson LG: Incidence of clinical mastitis in Danish dairy cattle and screening for non-reporting in a passively collected national surveillance system. Prev Vet Med 2001, 48(2):73-83.
  • [12]Østerås O, Solbu H, Refsdal AO, Roalkvam T, Filseth O, Minsaas A: Results and Evaluation of Thirty Years of Health Recordings in the Norwegian Dairy Cattle Population. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90(9):4483-4497.
  • [13]Sviland S, Waage S: Clinical bovine mastitis in Norway. Prev Vet Med 2002, 54(1):65-78.
  • [14]Wolff C, Espetvedt MN, Lind A, Rintakoski S, Egenvall A, Lindberg A, Emanuelson U: Completeness of the disease recording systems for dairy cows in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden with special reference to clinical mastitis. BMC Vet Res 2012, 8:131. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [15]Casella G, Berger RL: Statistical Inference. USA: Duxbury Press, Belmont, California; 1990.
  • [16]Egenvall A, Bonnett BN, Olson P, Hedhammar A: Validation of computerized Swedish dog and cat insurance data against veterinary practice records. Prev Vet Med 1998, 36(1):51-65.
  • [17]Jordan K, Porcheret M, Croft P: Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review. Farm Practice 2004, 21(4):396-412.
  • [18]Kadarmideen HN: Recording disease and reproductive events in dairy cattle for developing national health and fertility selection indices. Performance recording of animals: state of the art 2002. Interlaken, Switzerland: Proceedings of the 33rd Biennial Session of ICAR; 2002:157-161.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:12次