会议论文详细信息
3rd International Conference on Chemical Engineering Sciences and Applications 2017
Identification of Carbon loss in the production of pilot-scale Carbon nanotube using gauze reactor
Wulan, P.P.D.K.^1 ; Purwanto, W.W.^1 ; Yeni, N.^1 ; Lestari, Y.D.^1
Chemical Engineering Department, Universitas Indonesia, Depok
16424, Indonesia^1
关键词: Calculation error;    Carbon particulates;    Error measurements;    Gas chromatography-flame ionization detectors;    Glass fiber filters;    Pilot-scale reactors;    Product streams;    Production process;   
Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/334/1/012044/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/334/1/012044
来源: IOP
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Carbon loss more than 65% was the major obstacles in the Carbon Nanotube (CNT) production using gauze pilot scale reactor. The results showed that the initial carbon loss calculation is 27.64%. The calculation of carbon loss, then, takes place with various corrections parameters of: product flow rate error measurement, feed flow rate changes, gas product composition by Gas Chromatography Flame Ionization Detector (GC FID), and the carbon particulate by glass fiber filters. Error of product flow rate due to the measurement with bubble soap gives calculation error of carbon loss for about ± 4.14%. Changes in the feed flow rate due to CNT growth in the reactor reduce carbon loss by 4.97%. The detection of secondary hydrocarbon with GC FID during CNT production process reduces carbon loss by 5.14%. Particulates carried by product stream are very few and merely correct the carbon loss about 0.05%. Taking all the factors into account, the amount of carbon loss within this study is (17.21 ± 4.14)%. Assuming that 4.14% of carbon loss is due to the error measurement of product flow rate, the amount of carbon loss is 13.07%. It means that more than 57% of carbon loss within this study is identified.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
Identification of Carbon loss in the production of pilot-scale Carbon nanotube using gauze reactor 601KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:20次 浏览次数:21次