Determination of Failure Point of Asphalt-Mixture Fatigue-Test Results Using the Flow Number Method

International Conference on Advanced Materials for Better Future 2017

Wulan, C.E.P.^1 ; Setyawan, A.^1 ; Pramesti, F.P.^1

Road Mate Research Group, Civil Engineering Department, Sebelas Maret University, Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36 A, Surakarta

57126, Indonesia^1

关键词: Accumulated strain;    Empirical studies;    Ethyl vinyl acetate;    Indirect tensile fatigue;    Number of cycles to failure;    Optimum bitumen content;    Polymer modified asphalts;    Stress-controlled fatigue;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/333/1/012101/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/333/1/012101

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

The failure point of the results of fatigue tests of asphalt mixtures performed in controlled stress mode is difficult to determine. However, several methods from empirical studies are available to solve this problem. The objectives of this study are to determine the fatigue failure point of the results of indirect tensile fatigue tests using the Flow Number Method and to determine the best Flow Number model for the asphalt mixtures tested. In order to achieve these goals, firstly the best asphalt mixture of three was selected based on their Marshall properties. Next, the Indirect Tensile Fatigue Test was performed on the chosen asphalt mixture. The stress-controlled fatigue tests were conducted at a temperature of 20°C and frequency of 10 Hz, with the application of three loads: 500, 600, and 700 kPa. The last step was the application of the Flow Number methods, namely the Three-Stages Model, FNest Model, Francken Model, and Stepwise Method, to the results of the fatigue tests to determine the failure point of the specimen. The chosen asphalt mixture is EVA (Ethyl Vinyl Acetate) polymer -modified asphalt mixture with 6.5% OBC (Optimum Bitumen Content). Furthermore, the result of this study shows that the failure points of the EVA-modified asphalt mixture under loads of 500, 600, and 700 kPa are 6621, 4841, and 611 for the Three-Stages Model; 4271, 3266, and 537 for the FNest Model; 3401, 2431, and 421 for the Francken Model, and 6901, 6841, and 1291 for the Stepwise Method, respectively. These different results show that the bigger the loading, the smaller the number of cycles to failure. However, the best FN results are shown by the Three-Stages Model and the Stepwise Method, which exhibit extreme increases after the constant development of accumulated strain.