会议论文详细信息
2nd International Conference on New Material and Chemical Industry
Comparison of sound absorbing performances of copper foam and iron foam with the same parameters
材料科学;化学工业
Yang, X.C.^1 ; Shen, X.M.^1 ; Xu, P.J.^1 ; Zhang, X.N.^1 ; Bai, P.F.^1 ; Peng, K.^1 ; Yin, Q.^1 ; Wang, D.^1
College of Field Engineering, PLA University of Science and Technology, No. 1 Haifu Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu
210007, China^1
关键词: Combination modes;    Frequency ranges;    High frequency HF;    Low frequency range;    Sound absorbing;    Sound absorbing coefficients;    Sound frequency;    Standing wave;   
Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/292/1/012084/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/292/1/012084
学科分类:材料科学(综合)
来源: IOP
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Sound absorbing performances of the copper foam and the iron foam with the same parameters were investigated by the AWA6128A detector according to standing wave method. Two modes were investigated, which included the pure metal foam mode and the combination mode with the settled thickness of metal foam. In order to legibly compare the sound absorbing coefficients of the two metal foams, the detected sound frequency points were divided into the low frequency range (100 Hz ∼ 1000 Hz), the middle frequency range (1000 Hz ∼ 3200 Hz), and the high frequency range (3500 Hz ∼ 6000 Hz). Sound absorbing performances of the two metal foams in the two modes were discussed within the three frequency ranges in detail. It would be calculated that the average sound absorbing coefficients of copper foam in the pure metal foam mode were 12.6%, 22.7%, 34.6%, 43.6%, 51.1%, and 56.2% when the thickness was 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, and 30 mm. meanwhile, in the combination mode, the average sound absorbing coefficients of copper foam with the thickness of 10 mm were 30.6%, 34.8%, 36.3%, and 35.8% when the cavity was 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm. In addition, those of iron foam in the pure metal foam mode were 13.4%, 20.1%, 34.4%, 43.1%, 49.6%, and 56.1%, and in the combination mode were 25.6%, 30.5%, 34.3%, and 33.4%.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
Comparison of sound absorbing performances of copper foam and iron foam with the same parameters 1148KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:21次 浏览次数:17次