Microscopic bubble behaviour in suppression pool during wetwell venting

14th International Conference on Fluid Control, Measurements and Visualization

Zablackaite, G.^1 ; Nagasaka, H.^1 ; Kikura, H.^1

Laboratory for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-N1-7, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan^1

关键词: Bubble parameters;    Bubble velocities;    Depressurizations;    Hydrodynamic parameters;    Low temperatures;    Microscopic bubbles;    Non-condensable gas;    Particle tracking velocimetry;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/249/1/012017/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/249/1/012017

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

During a severe accident PCV failure should be avoided and fission products inside PCV should be confined as much as possible. In order to minimize FPs release, Wetwell venting is conducted by releasing steam-non-condensable gas mixture carrying FPs from the Drywell to Suppression Pool. Steam is condensed by subcooled water in the pool, and most of FPs are retained into water. The removal of FP in the water pool is referred to as "Pool Scrubbing effect". Hydrodynamic parameters of bubbles have impact on pool scrubbing effect. However, there is only few data available to evaluate quantitatively the bubble behaviour under depressurization and/or thermal stratification conditions. Series of experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of temperature distribution, non-condensable gas content and pressure in the Wetwell on bubble behaviour. Bubbles were visualized using High Speed Camera and adopting shadowgraphy technique. Applying Particle Tracking Velocimetry, bubble velocity and size distribution were obtained from recorded images. Experimental results show that with increasing suppression pool temperature, bubbles reaching the pool surface decreased in size and traveling velocity became slower. In pressurized wetwell, bubble behaviour was similar to that in the heated up suppression pool case, although bubble parameters were similar to the low temperature case. Higher air content induced water surface movement and bubbles were smaller due to break up.