会议论文详细信息
World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium - WMCAUS
Evaluation of Supply Chain Management Systems Used in Civil Engineering
土木建筑工程
Tomczak, Michal^1 ; Rzepecki, Lukasz^1
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, ul. Nadbystrzycka 40, Lublin
20-618, Poland^1
关键词: Comparative analysis;    Construction projects;    Evaluation criteria;    General contractors;    Information flows;    Interval type-2 fuzzy sets;    Physical resources;    Supply chain management system;   
Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/245/7/072005/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/245/7/072005
学科分类:土木及结构工程学
来源: IOP
PDF
【 摘 要 】
One of the most important factors which have an effect on the cost and time of the building process is the organization of physical resources and the information flow structure. Depending on how effective this system is, a building project may end with a success or a failure. Because of many conditions of the construction executing and different needs of the contractors, there are different Supply Chain Management (SCM) systems connected with supplying construction projects: single-stage, multi-stage or combined. The article presents a comparative analysis of construction SCM systems based on a modified fuzzy AHP. The modification of this method is based on the use of interval type-2 fuzzy sets to aggregate evaluation according to the idea proposed by Mikhailov. The use of such a model of group preferences of decision-makers, makes it possible to take into consideration both the linguistic imprecision of an evaluation and the small number of experts. The weight values of specific criteria and the final scale vector of considered variants are obtained during the analysis. This may give a recommendation to general contractors in construction projects about which evaluation criteria and supply systems are preferred.
【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
Evaluation of Supply Chain Management Systems Used in Civil Engineering 336KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:77次