Optimization and Analysis of Laser Beam Machining Parameters for Al7075-TiB2 In-situ Composite

International Conference on Advances in Materials and Manufacturing Applications 2016

Manjoth, S.^1 ; Keshavamurthy, R.^1 ; Kumar, G.S. Pradeep^1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Bangalore, India^1

关键词: Analysis of variance method;    Dimensional accuracy;    Experimental trials;    In-situ synthesized;    L9 orthogonal arrays;    Stand-off distance (SoD);    Verification experiments;    Volumetric material;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012013/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012013

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

The paper focuses on laser beam machining (LBM) of In-situ synthesized Al7075-TiB2metal matrix composite. Optimization and influence of laser machining process parameters on surface roughness, volumetric material removal rate (VMRR) and dimensional accuracy of composites were studied. Al7075-TiB2metal matrix composite was synthesized by in-situ reaction technique using stir casting process. Taguchi's L9 orthogonal array was used to design experimental trials. Standoff distance (SOD) (0.3 - 0.5mm), Cutting Speed (1000 - 1200 m/hr) and Gas pressure (0.5 - 0.7 bar) were considered as variable input parameters at three different levels, while power and nozzle diameter were maintained constant with air as assisting gas. Optimized process parameters for surface roughness, volumetric material removal rate (VMRR) and dimensional accuracy were calculated by generating the main effects plot for signal noise ratio (S/N ratio) for surface roughness, VMRR and dimensional error using Minitab software (version 16). The Significant of standoff distance (SOD), cutting speed and gas pressure on surface roughness, volumetric material removal rate (VMRR) and dimensional error were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) method. Results indicate that, for surface roughness, cutting speed (56.38%) is most significant parameter followed by standoff distance (41.03%) and gas pressure (2.6%). For volumetric material removal (VMRR), gas pressure (42.32%) is most significant parameter followed by cutting speed (33.60%) and standoff distance (24.06%). For dimensional error, Standoff distance (53.34%) is most significant parameter followed by cutting speed (34.12%) and gas pressure (12.53%). Further, verification experiments were carried out to confirm performance of optimized process parameters.