Comparison of different Methods to model Transient Turbulent Magnetohydrodynamic Flow in Continuous Casting Molds

International Symposium on Liquid Metal Processing & Casting 2015

材料科学;金属工艺学

Kratzsch, C.^1 ; Asad, A.^1 ; Schwarze, R.^1

TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Institute of Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics, Lampadiusstraße 4, Freiberg

09599, Germany^1

关键词: Computer technology;    Continuous casting mold;    Delayed detached eddy simulation (DDES);    Magneto-hydrodynamic flow;    Mesh resolution;    Orders of magnitude;    Transient behavior;    URANS simulation;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/143/1/012025/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/143/1/012025

学科分类：材料科学（综合）

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Modeling of the processes in the continuous casting mold engaged many scientists once the computer-technology was able to accomplish that task. Despite that, CFD modeling of the fluid flow is still challenging. The methods allow deeper and deeper inside views into transient flow processes. Mostly two kinds of methods are applied for this purpose. URANS simulations are used for a coarse overview of the transient behavior on scales determined by the big rollers inside the mold. Besides, LES were done to study the processes on smaller scales. Unfortunately, the effort to set up a LES is orders of magnitude higher in time and space compared to URANS. Often, the flow determining processes take place in small areas inside the flow domain. Hence, scale resolving methods (SRS) came up, which resolve the turbulence in some amount in these regions, whereas they go back to URANS in the regions of less importance. It becomes more complex when dealing with magnetic fields in terms of EMBr devices. The impact of electro magnetically forces changes the flow structure remarkably. Many important effects occur, e.g. MHD turbulence, which are attributable to processes on large turbulent scales. To understand the underlying phenomena in detail, SRS allows a good inside view by resolving these processes partially. This study compares two of these methods, namely the Scale Adaptive Simulation (SAS) and the Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES), with respect to rendition of the results known from experiments and URANS simulation. The results show, that the SAS as well as the DDES are able to deliver good results with higher mesh resolutions in important regions in the flow domain.