| Modern Technologies in Industrial Engineering 2015 | |
| Processing of cylindrical hollow parts: piercing vs. extrusion | |
| Comneci, R.^1 ; Zaharia, L.^1 ; Nedelcu, D.^1 ; Bujoreanu, L.G.^1 | |
| Technical University Gheorghe Asachi, Iasi | |
| 700050, Romania^1 | |
| 关键词: Backward extrusion; Experimental test; Material Flow; Numerical predictions; Numerical results; Work principle; Working loads; Yield pressure; | |
| Others : https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012032/pdf DOI : 10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012032 |
|
| 来源: IOP | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
As work principle, piercing (P) and backward extrusion (BE) are similar deforming processes. However, working-load, strain and material flow are quiet different depending on real conditions. Since punch diameter d and workpiece diameter D are the defining parameters for both P and BE, there is a critical d/D ratio separating them as distinctive operations. To have a complete description of P and BE in terms of working load and yield pressure as function of d/D ratio, experimental tests and numerical predictions were conducted. Tridimensional finite element analysis (FEA) for different process designs (i.e. different d/D ratios) revealed distinctive evolutions of the material flow establishing the effective limits of P and BE respectively. Experimental and numerical results can be used in practice to provide estimates of working-load, critical yield pressure and tool dimensions for optimal P and BE in processing of cylindrical hollow parts..
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processing of cylindrical hollow parts: piercing vs. extrusion | 1654KB |
PDF