Correlation between radiographic analysis of alveolar bone density around dental implant and resonance frequency of dental implant

1st Physics and Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry Symposium

物理学;医药卫生

Prawoko, S.S.^1 ; Nelwan, L.C.^1 ; Odang, R.W.^1 ; Kusdhany, L.S.^1

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia^1

关键词: Dental radiographs;    Digital radiographic images;    Implant placement;    Implant stability;    Noninvasive methods;    Reproducibilities;    Resonance frequencies;    Resonance frequency analysis;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/884/1/012055/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1742-6596/884/1/012055

学科分类：卫生学

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

The histomorphometric test is the gold standard for dental implant stability quantification; however, it is invasive, and therefore, it is inapplicable to clinical patients. Consequently, accurate and objective alternative methods are required. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and digital radiographic analysis are noninvasive methods with excellent objectivity and reproducibility. To analyze the correlation between the radiographic analysis of alveolar bone density around a dental implant and the resonance frequency of the dental implant. Digital radiographic images for 35 samples were obtained, and the resonance frequency of the dental implant was acquired using Osstell ISQ immediately after dental implant placement and on third-month follow-up. The alveolar bone density around the dental implant was subsequently analyzed using SIDEXIS-XG software. No significant correlation was reported between the alveolar bone density around the dental implant and the resonance frequency of the dental implant (r = -0.102 at baseline, r = 0.146 at follow-up, p > 0.05). However, the alveolar bone density and resonance frequency showed a significant difference throughout the healing period (p = 0.005 and p = 0.000, respectively). Conclusion: Digital dental radiographs and Osstell ISQ showed excellent objectivity and reproducibility in quantifying dental implant stability. Nonetheless, no significant correlation was observed between the results obtained using these two methods.