Analysis and comparison between rough channel and pipe flows

2nd Multiflow Summer School on Turbulence

Sassun, David^1 ; Flores, Oscar^2 ; Orlandi, Paolo^1

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Aerospaziale, Sapienza Universitá di Roma, Via Eudossiana 16, Roma

00184, Italy^1

Dep. Bioingenieria e Ing. Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avd Universidad 30, Leganes, Madrid

28911, Spain^2

关键词: Immersed boundary;    Longitudinal bars;    Low Reynolds number;    RMS velocities;    Rough channels;    Roughness function;    Spectral energy density;    Turbulent channels;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/708/1/012011/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1742-6596/708/1/012011

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel and pipe flows are presented to highlight the effect of roughness at low Reynolds number (Reτ= 180 - 360). Several surfaces are reproduced with the immersed boundaries method, allowing a one-to-one comparison of the two canonical flows. In general, all rough surfaces produce the same effect on the flow in pipes and channels, with small differences in the roughness function, RMS velocities and spectral energy density of pipes and channels. The only exception is for the rough surfaces made of longitudinal bars. In particular, the triangular bars (riblets) show drag reduction in the channel and drag increase in the pipe. This behaviour is linked to the development of spanwise rollers and wide u-structures near the plane of the crest of the pipe.