Harvesting of freshwater microalgae biomass by Scenedesmus sp. as bioflocculant

4th International Seminar on Sustainable Urban Development

地球科学;经济学

Rinanti, A.^1 ; Purwadi, R.^2

Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Lanscape Architecture and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia^1

Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia^2

关键词: Bioflocculants;    Cultivation periods;    Flocculation process;    freshwater;    Freshwater microalgae;    Micro-algae;    Scenedesmus obliquus;    Sedimentation rates;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012087/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012087

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

This study is particularly expected to provide information on the diversity of microalgae as the flocculant agent that gives the highest biomass yield. Bioflocculation was done by using one of the flocculating microalgae i.e. Scenedesmus obliquus to concentrate on non-flocculating microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. The freshwater microalgae S. obliquus tested it ability to harvest other non-flocculating microalgae, increased sedimentation rate in the flocculation process and increased biomass yield. The flocculation of biomass microalgae with chemical flocculant as comparison was done by adding alum (K2SO4•Al2(SO4)3•24H2O). The addition of alum (K2SO4•Al2(SO4)3•24H2O) as flocculant at pH 11 and S. obliquus sp. as bioflocculant caused significant alteration of nutrition of microalgae. Overall, the essential content produced by flocculation method with addition of alum or with bioflocculation (%, mg/100 mg dry weight) are lipid 31,64; 38,69, protein 30,79; 38.50%, and chlorophyll 0.6253; 0.8420). Harvesting with bioflocculation methods conducted at the end of the cultivation period increase the amount of biomass significantly and can accelerate the settling time of biomass. Harvesting microalgae cells by bioflocculation method becomes an economically competitive harvesting method compared to alum as a chemical flocculant because of the cheaper cost of flocculant, not toxic so it does not require further water treatment after harvesting due to the use of alum as chemical flocculants.