The Implementation of Analytical Hierarchy Process Method for Outstanding Achievement Scholarship Reception Selection at Universal University of Batam

International Conference on Environment and Technology 2017

生态环境科学

Marfuah^1 ; Widiantoro, Suryo^1

Universitas Universal, Batam, Indonesia^1

关键词: Alternative;    Alternative priority;    Analytical Hierarchy Process;    Analytical hierarchy process method;    Criteria;    Outstanding Scholarship;    Pair-wise comparison matrixes;    Telecommunication engineering;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/97/1/012003/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/97/1/012003

学科分类：环境科学（综合）

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Universal University of Batam offers outstanding achievement scholarship to the current students to be each year of new academic year, seeing the large number of new Students who are interested to get it then the selection team should be able to filter and choose the eligible ones. The selection process starting with evaluation and judgement made by the experts. There were five criteria as the basic of selection and each had three alternatives that must be considered. Based on the policy of University the maximum number of recipients are five for each of six study programs. Those programs are art of music, dance, industrial engineering, environmental engineering, telecommunication engineering, and software engineering. The expert choice was subjective that AHP method was used to help in making decision consistently by doing pairwise comparison matrix process between criteria based on selected alternatives, by determining the priority order of criteria and alternatives used. The results of these calculations were used as supporting decision-making to determine the eligible students receiving scholarships based on alternatives of selected criteria determined by the final results of AHP method calculation with the priority criterion A (0.37%), C (0.23%), E (0.21%), D (0.14%) and B (0.06%), value of consistency ratio 0.05. Then the alternative priorities 1 (0.63), 2 (0.26) and 3 (0.11) the consistency ratio values 0.03, where each CR ≤ 0.1 or consistent weighting preference.