Determination of Shift/Bias in Digital Aerial Triangulation of UAV Imagery Sequences

World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium 2017

Wierzbicki, Damian^1

Department of Remote Sensing, Photogrammetry and Imagery Intelligence, Geodesy Institute, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 2 Kaliskiego st., Warsaw, Poland^1

关键词: Aerial triangulation;    Digital terrain model;    Ground control points;    Ground surfaces;    High resolution;    Imagery sequence;    Pipeline inspection;    Quality of product;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/95/3/032033/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/95/3/032033

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Currently UAV Photogrammetry is characterized a largely automated and efficient data processing. Depicting from the low altitude more often gains on the meaning in the uses of applications as: cities mapping, corridor mapping, road and pipeline inspections or mapping of large areas e.g. forests. Additionally, high-resolution video image (HD and bigger) is more often use for depicting from the low altitude from one side it lets deliver a lot of details and characteristics of ground surfaces features, and from the other side is presenting new challenges in the data processing. Therefore, determination of elements of external orientation plays a substantial role the detail of Digital Terrain Models and artefact-free ortophoto generation. Parallel a research on the quality of acquired images from UAV and above the quality of products e.g. orthophotos are conducted. Despite so fast development UAV photogrammetry still exists the necessity of accomplishment Automatic Aerial Triangulation (AAT) on the basis of the observations GPS/INS and via ground control points. During low altitude photogrammetric flight, the approximate elements of external orientation registered by UAV are burdened with the influence of some shift/bias errors. In this article, methods of determination shift/bias error are presented. In the process of the digital aerial triangulation two solutions are applied. In the first method shift/bias error was determined together with the drift/bias error, elements of external orientation and coordinates of ground control points. In the second method shift/bias error was determined together with the elements of external orientation, coordinates of ground control points and drift/bias error equals 0. When two methods were compared the difference for shift/bias error is more than ±0.01 m for all terrain coordinates XYZ.