Economic and Thermodynamic Analysis for Preliminary Design of Dry Steam Geothermal Power Plant (GPP) with Multifarious Gas Removal System (GRS) in Kamojang, West Java, Indonesia

5th ITB International Geothermal Workshop

Pranadi, Aloysius Damar^1 ; Sihana^1 ; Suryopratomo, Kutut^1 ; Salis, Fiki Rahmatika^1

Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika 2, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia^1

关键词: C++ language;    Economic study;    Gas removal;    Geothermal potential;    Low enthalpies;    Net present value analysis;    Preliminary design;    Thermo dynamic analysis;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/42/1/012011/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/42/1/012011

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Indonesia has great number of geothermal potential separated by two kind of potential, 16.13 GW for high enthalpy and 7.88 GW for low enthalpy speculative resources [4]. In the end of 2013, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources stated that Geothermal Power Plant (GPP) in Indonesia have been built about 1.34 GW in capacity and wanted to seriously develop geothermal potential up to 6.64 GW by 2025 [8]. Cost is one of famous obstacle in Indonesia's GPP Development. To reduce grand total cost of GPP, this paper will present the relation between thermodynamic and economic analysis in purpose to find the most economical gas removal system in GPP. By gleaning data at Kamojang Steam Field on behalf of PT Pertamina Geothermal Energy, this study will thermodynamically analyze and calculate a GPP preliminary design with software, named as Cycle Tempo 5.0. In additional, writers create motive steam calculator (based on C++ language) to enhance thermodynamic analysis for gas removal system (GRS) and adapted the results in Cycle Tempo 5.0. After thermodynamic analysis has been done, economic study will be undertaken by Net Present Value Analysis to compare the utilization cost of three different GRS and find which kind of GRS is more economical for nearly 30 years operation. For the result, Dual LRVP has higher performance than the others, spend less utilization cost and more economical for nearly 30 years operation. Moreover, the economic analysis for replacement of gas removal system shown in this paper too. In conclusion, GPP with Dual LRVP is proper to be developed in the future Geothermal Power Plant or to replace the existing GRS in some existing GPP in Indonesia.