The practical use of module D in a building case study: assumptions, limitations and methodological issues

SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT D-A-CH CONFERENCE 2019

生态环境科学

Delem, L.^1 ; Wastiels, L.^1

Belgian Building Research Institute (BBRI-CSTC-WTCB), Brussels, Belgium^1

关键词: Building life cycle;    Case study analysis;    Critical discussions;    Functional equivalence;    Open-loop recycling;    Potential benefits;    Primary production;    Secondary materials;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012048/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012048

学科分类：环境科学（综合）

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

According to the EN 15804 and EN 15978, a material or building life cycle consists of three major life cycle stages or so-called modules: Production and Construction (module A), Use (module B) and End-of-life (module C). Potential benefits and loads occurring beyond the building's life cycle as a result of recycling, reuse or energy recovery can be declared in an additional module D. As part of the upcoming amendment of the EN 15804 a formula was developed to facilitate the calculation of module D. This paper provides a critical discussion on the practical use of module D. First of all, the development of the formula revealed specific methodological issues, such as the unequal approach to closed and open loop recycling. Secondly, the consideration of module D in a Belgian building LCA case study provided insights in the different methodological choices, interpretations, and assumptions related to the calculation of module D. This concerns for example the calculation of net output flows of secondary materials, modelling of avoided primary production, definition of the point of functional equivalence, efficiency of incineration, etc. Aspects that are not clearly specified in the standard and therefore can be open to interpretation are illustrated with concrete examples from the building case study. Where possible, recommendations for a harmonized approach are made. In any way, the results from the case study analysis reveal that the methodological choices can have a significant effect on the results and that module D results should therefore be considered with care.