会议论文详细信息
5th International Seminar on Sciences
Simulation study for comparison of spatial autoregressive probit estimation methods
自然科学(总论)
Novkaniza, F.^1^2 ; Djuraidah, A.^1 ; Fitrianto, A.^1 ; Sumertajaya, I.M.^1
Department of Statistics, IPB University, Bogor
16680, Indonesia^1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok
16424, Indonesia^2
关键词: Confidence interval;    Estimation methods;    Estimation of parameters;    Extensive simulations;    Root mean square errors;    Simulation studies;    Spatial dependence;    Spatial weight matrixes;   
Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/299/1/012030/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/299/1/012030
学科分类:自然科学(综合)
来源: IOP
PDF
【 摘 要 】

One of probit model variant with spatial dependent is spatial autoregressive (SAR) probit model. In SAR probit model, the spatial dependence structure adds complexity to the estimation of parameters. There are four methods for estimating the parameter of SAR probit model; maximum likelihood, Bayes, linearized GMM, and conditional approximate likelihood. The purpose of this article is to choose the best estimation method from four methods describes above using some extensive simulation which can handle sample sizes with large observations and various value of spatial lag coefficient, provided the spatial weight matrix is in an inconvenient sparse form, as is for large data sets, where each observation neighbors only a few other observations. The best estimation method is chosen based on the shortest confidence interval for the mean of SAR probit estimation, lowest bias, and Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of prediction. It was found that conditional approximate likelihood method was the best among the four methods concerning confidence interval and bias, yet regarding estimating RMSE, maximum likelihood estimation performed better. Maximum likelihood, Bayes, and conditional approximate likelihood method were better than linearized GMM in SAR probit parameter estimation for large dataset.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
Simulation study for comparison of spatial autoregressive probit estimation methods 682KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:17次 浏览次数:25次