Public Procurement Management as a Factor of National Sustainability (the Case of KPI Implementation in Russia)

International science and technology conference "Earth science"

Zolochevskaya, E.^1 ; Popova, E.^1 ; Medyakova, E.^1

South-Russia Institute of Management, Branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Puskinskaya st.70, Rostov-on-Don

344007, Russia^1

关键词: Assessment criteria;    Domestic policies;    Key performance indicators;    Management level;    Performance assessment;    Public management;    Public procurement;    Russian federation;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/272/3/032110/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/272/3/032110

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

In the context of international mutual economic restrictions, Russian contract system is becoming a relevant tool to solve problems in domestic policy. There is no single model to assess the effectiveness of procurement system in the world practice. In Russia, the assessment of this system performance is done by a number of executive authorities for their specific purposes. It is necessary to create an intelligent system of key performance indicators for public management budget procurement. Such system is required for current and rapid adjustments of decisions at all levels of a complex and multiple public procurement system in the Russian Federation. The article summarizes the possibilities to use principles of key performance indicators methods for performance assessment of public procurement management in Russia. A more detailed performance examination of specific groups of participants in the procurement system ranged according to the management levels and regions will enable in an integrated manner to evaluate the relevance of each group to the world procurement standards, to the professional requirements and to the performance appropriateness in accordance with the set goals. The article presents the effect of the overall assessment of the procurement system in five main areas. Delayed assessment criteria are identified. It is pointed out that their effectiveness is appropriate to evaluate in dynamics.