会议论文详细信息
Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Technology and Engineering
Comparison analysis of overlay thickness using the AASHTO 1993 method and the everseries program
工业技术(总论)
Gerardo, Faisal^1 ; Subagio, Bambang Sugeng^2 ; Jihanny, Jongga^1 ; Andari, Gusfina Try^1
Graduate School of Highway Engineering, ITB, Bandung, Indonesia^1
Civil Engineering Departement, ITB, Bandung, Indonesia^2
关键词: Comparison analysis;    Falling weight deflectometer (FWD);    Flexible pavements;    Modelling systems;    Resilient modulus;    Seasonal variation;    Structural capacities;    Structural number;   
Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/508/1/012070/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/508/1/012070
学科分类:工业工程学
来源: IOP
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The purpose of this research is to analyze the structural capacity of flexible pavement based on deflection data from Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) and to compare the results of overlay thickness calculation using AASHTO 1993 Method and Everseries Program. Two layer modelling system is applied in AASHTO 1993 Method and to determine the value of Resilient Modulus (MR), Pavement Effective Modulus (Ep) and Structural Number (SN). The overlay thickness result by AASHTO 1993 method ranged from 5 cm to 13 cm. To comparing the result, the 2-layer system modeling by Everseries Program is used. The modulus can be calculated by Evercalc subprogram using the deflection data as inputs. Furthermore, the overlay thickness calculated by Everpave subprogram produces overlay thickness range from 5 cm to 25 cm. Based on the analysis result, there is a difference overlay thickness between using AASHTO 1993 Method and Everseries Program. Everseries program produce overlay thickness thicker than AASHTO 1993 method, because there are several different parameters such as deflection data, temperature by seasonal variations and traffic loads.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
Comparison analysis of overlay thickness using the AASHTO 1993 method and the everseries program 604KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:41次 浏览次数:19次